Re: [Simple] The need for draft-denis-simple-msrp-comedia-01.txt

[<Markus.Isomaki at nokia.com>]

Hi,
 
To my understanding there are actually three different models how people
may want to setup MSRP:
 
1. Reusing the B2BUA/SBC infra they have for voice already. For this
draft-denis-simple-msrp-comedia would be needed.
2. Reusing the ICE/TURN infra they may have sometime in the future. For
this draft-niemi-simple-msrp-ice would make sense.
3. Building a special infra based on MSRP relays. This is what we have
as RFC already.

So it seems that we will probably need to support all of these three
models. Each has their pros and cons, so there is no single answer which
one is the best. Personally I'm only aware of plans by some
ISPs/operators to deploy MSRP according to model 1. Model 2 would be
nice by the time we have ICE and TURN deployed, but that will still take
time to happen. Model 3 probably makes sense for instance for
enterprises who want to log messages and so on, but haven't heard of any
plans for it either.

So, +1 for the counter for draft-denis-simple-msrp-comedia.

Markus
 

________________________________

	From: simple-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:simple-bounces at ietf.org]
On Behalf Of ext Hisham Khartabil
	Sent: 01 April, 2008 07:54
	To: Hadriel Kaplan
	Cc: simple at ietf.org
	Subject: Re: [Simple] The need for
draft-denis-simple-msrp-comedia-01.txt
	
	
	(As an individual)
	 
	If RFC4976 is not the solution that people are willing to adopt,
then I would like to promote draft-niemi-simple-msrp-ice.
	 
	Thanks,
	Hisham
	
	 
	On 19/03/2008, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com> wrote: 

		Howdy,
		I noticed that draft-denis-simple-msrp-comedia-01.txt
was not on the agenda for simple this past week, and I wasn't sure why.
When it was presented a while back I thought there was interest for it
shown in the WG meeting, and it really is needed.  Turns out it's
because there hasn't been enough traffic on it in the mailing list.  So
this email is being sent to increase whatever counter exists for such
things.
		;)
		
		This draft should be a WG item, imho.  It's not the only
problem to fix, but it's a non-trivial change/extension that needs to be
available before too many UA's/AS's get out there.  This type of thing
really needs to be done as early as possible, methinks.
		
		-hadriel
		_______________________________________________
		Simple mailing list
		Simple at ietf.org
		https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
		


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple