Re: [Simple] comments on draft-ietf-simple-view-sharing-00

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen at cisco.com>]

a correction here:

Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Salvatore Loreto wrote:
> > thanks for the answer, now the scenario is more clear then when I read 
> > it in the draft.
> > So the ACL will list that users (users in the originating domain that 
> > are authorized to subscribe to that presentity,
> > but who will end up receiving a different view) only in the case where 
> > the default behavior is to *block*.
> > However if the default behavior is *allow* it is useless list that 
> > user, isn't it?
> > maybe it should be better explain clearer the scenario.
>
> Yes, you are correct. I will mention this. I suspect the more common 
> case is a default of 'block' of course.

Actually this is wrong. The ACL is really specifying views for watchers. 
When there is a default, it means, "this is the default view". So, if 
there are users that are allowed but are not going to get the default 
view, they need to be enumerated as well. So, the rule is correct as 
stated in the document: if a default view is included, you HAVE to 
include an enumeration of all other views that users might receive. This 
is true regardless of whether the default view is blocked or not.

-Jonathan R.

--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow                                   Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
jdrosen at cisco.com
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple