Re: [Simple] MSRP-ACM compatibility

[Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil at gmail.com>]

Hi,

1) We seem to have consensus that it must be possible for MSRP devices
using ACM to talk to devices using relays.

We don't have consensus on how far we are willing to update
RFC4975/4976 to accomplish this. We don't have consensus around any
currently proposed mechanism to accomplish the requirement.

2) We seem to have consensus that the parts of the draft about using
COMEDIA for negotiating the TCP connection direction is reasonable.

Does anyone object to the concensus?

Regards,
Hisham


2009/4/1 Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil at gmail.com>:
> The MSRP-ACM draft has an open requirements question on backwards
> compatibility with endpoints that use MSRP relays. In San Francisco
> some 20 or so people raised their hands one way or another on this
> question, yet only a much smaller number have engaged in the list
> discussion.
>
> Please offer your opinions on the following questions. We'd appreciate
> the reasoning behind your opinions, rather than just yes or no votes.
> We'd really like to hear from every person who raised a hand in San
> Francisco. If you stated an opinion at the microphone, please restate
> it here.
>
> 1) Is there a requirement for an endpoint that uses the C-line
> addressing mechanism in the MSRP-ACM draft to be able to talk to an
> endpoint that uses an MSRP relay (RFC 4976).
>
> 2) If you said yes to 1), is it acceptable to update RFC 4975 and/or
> RFC 4976 to achieve compatibility?  If so, how extensively?
>
> Much appreciated,
> Hisham
>