SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- [Simple] XCAP Issue 4 Interim Summary: document to element separator,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] XCAP Issue 3 Interim Summary: PUT vs. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] XCAP Issue 2 Interim Summary: Positional Insertions,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Ending a session,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- [Simple] XCAP directory I-D,
Miguel Garcia
- [Simple] MSRP: Rejecting a message which can't fully be received,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 3: Domain filter vs. resource filter,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] MSRP: updated offer on transaction timeout or non-2x x/415 respons e,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- [Simple] MSRP: updated offer on transaction timeout or non-2xx/415 respons e,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- [Simple] MSRP: Ending a session,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- [Simple] Xcap authorization rules - Multiple URIs in Identity,
Schmidt Christian
- [Simple] A requirement on retrieving "List of Lists" using XCAP,
Nilo Mitra (NY/EMX)
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps - WGLC summary,
mikko . lonnfors
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-iscomposing-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Simple] New version of XCAP PIDF manipulation draft [nits],
Biot Olivier
- [Simple] RE: poll for IPR notification impact on iscomposing,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 5: XPATH usage,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 4: Replacing a filter,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 3: Domain filter vs. resource filter,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 1: Multiple filters for a resource,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 2: Propagating filters,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-partial-pidf-format-01.txt,
AC Mahendran
- [Simple] SIPIT 15 registration is open,
Robert Sparks
- [Simple] poll for IPR notification impact on iscomposing,
Robert Sparks
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- Re: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Ben Campbell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Chris Boulton
- Re: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Andrew Allen
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Adam Roach
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Corby . Wilson
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Andrew Allen
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Adam Roach
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Atle Monrad (GR/ETO)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] Re: MSRP: Max message size indication,
Drage, Keith (Keith)
- [Simple] MSRP: Max message size indication,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- [Simple] New version of XCAP PIDF manipulation draft,
Markus . Isomaki
- [Simple] Fwd: SIMPLE/SIP/SIPPING/XCON Working Groups Joint Interim Meeting Announcement,
Rohan Mahy
- [Simple] MSRP: Comments on draft-ietf-simple-msrp-relays-00.txt,
Ben Campbell
- [Simple] RPID/CIPID comments,
Ben Campbell
- RE: [Simple] RPID - moods,
Sharon Fridman
- [Simple] interim meeting - jabber?,
Tschofenig Hannes
- [Simple] MSRP DSN's (-06),
Eric Burger
- [Simple] How to prevent final NOTIFY?,
Surya Gogineni
- [Simple] solving open open issues on authz drafts,
Hannes Tschofenig
- [Simple] [Fwd: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits],
Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: [Simple] Presence Rules Issue 4: Rules apply to tuple or to s ubscription,
George Foti (QA/EMC)
- [Simple] Presence Rules Issue 4: Rules apply to tuple or to subscription,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] event-list,
Gabor . Bajko
- [Simple] RPID: an element representing the presentity vs. the tuple,
Aki Niemi
- [Simple] RPID comments,
Aki Niemi
- [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] RPID: what does tuple-type really mean?,
mikko . lonnfors
- AW: AW: [Simple] RPID - moods,
Schmidt Christian
- [Simple] CIPID comments,
Aki Niemi
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-message-sessions-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-msrp-relays-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Simple] Question on Partial Publish,
George Foti (QA/EMC)
- [Simple] XML schema validation,
Miguel Garcia
- AW: [Simple] RPID - moods,
Schmidt Christian
- [Simple] MSRP core spec update (06 version),
Ben Campbell
- [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-msrp-relays-00.txt,
Cullen Jennings
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-iscomposing-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-presence-10.txt,
Surya Gogineni
- [Simple] Details on MSRP Details (DSN),
Eric Burger
- [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID,
Mary Barnes
- [Simple] WGLC Extension for CIPID,
Mary Barnes
- [Simple] WGLC Extension for future status,
Mary Barnes
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-xcap-pidf-manipulation-usage-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification - summary,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status [RPID],
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Markus . Isomaki
- [Simple] cipid-01 and future-01,
Paul Kyzivat
- [Simple] Nits on RPID,
Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status [CIPIC],
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status [Future],
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC on RPID, CIPID and future status [CIPID],
eva-maria . leppanen
- [Simple] WGLC Extension for RPID, CIPID and future status,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Comments on MSRP,
Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
- RE: [Simple] WGLC on RPID, CIPID and future status [Future],
eva-maria . leppanen
- [Simple] isComposing WGLC summary,
Henning Schulzrinne
- [Simple] XCAP issue 7: uniqueness in intermediate hops,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] List Participation,
Robert Sparks
- [simple] Discussion about solution(s) for reducing load in the air interface in publishing,
eva-maria . leppanen
- [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- Re: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
Paul Kyzivat
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: prescaps,
mikko . lonnfors
- [Simple] Deadline for internet drafts submission before interim,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Simple] XCAP issue 6: selecting elements by text value,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] XCAP issue 5: selecting multiple elements,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] XCAP issue 4: document to element separator (again!),
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Dean Willis
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Dean Willis
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Ted Hardie
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3 & 5: idempotence & multiple selection,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3 & 5: idempotence & multiple selection,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3 & 5: idempotence & multiple selection,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3 & 5: idempotence & multiple selection,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3 & 5: idempotence & multiple selection,
Jari Urpalainen
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Dean Willis
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Aki Niemi
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
Jari Urpalainen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] xcap issue 3: PUT v. POST,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] xcap issue 2: positional insertions,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] XCAP Issue 1: Schema extensibility,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] Comments and NITs on draft-ietf-simple-rpid-03,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-simple-presence-rules-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Simple] Identity in Presence Authorization,
Miguel Garcia
- [Simple] Poll: Adopt message exploder draft from SIMPLE?,
Dean Willis
- [Simple] Presence Rules Issue 3: Specifying views,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-simple-partial-notify-02,
mikko . lonnfors
- [Simple] Filtering XSD Document Problem,
Rajesh Karunamurthy
- [Simple] Presence Rules Issue 1: Provide Contact URI defaults,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Henning Schulzrinne
- [Simple] XCAP implementation,
陳俊忞 \(Chun-Min Chen\)
- Re: [Simple] XCAP implementation,
Jari Urpalainen
- Re: [Simple] XCAP implementation,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] XCAP implementation,
Jari Urpalainen
- Re: [Simple] XCAP implementation,
Ted Hardie
- Re: [Simple] XCAP implementation,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules - rpid type,
Henning Schulzrinne
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules,
Markus . Isomaki
- RE: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] Update to xcap authorization rules,
hisham . khartabil
- AW: AW: AW: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Schmidt Christian
- AW: AW: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Schmidt Christian
- AW: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Schmidt Christian
- [Simple] Comments on isComposing,
hisham . khartabil
- [Simple] Problem with XML Schema for Filter Criteria,
Rajesh Karunamurthy
- [Simple] Comments on draft-ietf-simple-partial-notify-02,
Dean Willis
- [Simple] WGLC on RPID, CIPID and future status,
hisham . khartabil
- [no subject],
Unknown
- [Simple] RE: Updating the XCAP PIDF manipulation draft,
George Foti (QA/EMC)
- [Simple] Updating the XCAP PIDF manipulation draft,
Markus . Isomaki
- [Simple] RE: "isComposing" and such using MSRP,
Orit Levin
- [Simple] "isComposing" and such using MSRP,
Orit Levin
- [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Robert Sparks
- Re: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Robert Sparks
- Re: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Robert Sparks
- Re: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
Robert Sparks
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
mikko . lonnfors
- RE: [Simple] WGLC: partial notification,
hisham . khartabil
Mail converted by MHonArc
