Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Jun 28 2007
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Keepalive mechanisms and related flags in outbound-09, Jerry Yin
• RE: [Sip] Changes to the INVITE transaction to address bug 769, Gilad Shaham
• Re: [Sip] Changes to the INVITE transaction to address bug 769, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Keepalive mechanisms and related flags in outbound-09, Erkki.Koivusalo
• [Sip] Changes to the INVITE transaction to address bug 769, Robert Sparks
• Jun 27 2007
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-outbound-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-sips-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before thepreviousNOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] SIP SAML Draft Review by Sebastian Felis, Tschofenig, Hannes
• RE: [Sip] Keepalive mechanisms for TCP flows in outbound-08, Erkki.Koivusalo
• [Sip] RFC3261 issue: no integrity protection for ACK, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before thepreviousNOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Xiao Wang
• 答复: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before thepreviousNOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Gerald Yan
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Francois Audet
• Jun 26 2007
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Markus.Isomaki
• Jun 25 2007
• Re: [Sip] New draft modifying RFC 4412 for Responses, Janet P Gunn
• [Sip] Publication request for draft-ietf-sip-gruu-14.txt, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-gruu-14.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] (no subject), peter_blatherwick
• RE: [Sip] Comments on draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-01, Qian Sun
• Jun 24 2007
• [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01 what goes on inside the TLS tunnel, ravishankar.shiroor
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, ravishankar.shiroor
• Jun 22 2007
• [Sip] Updated domain-certs draft (draft-gurbani-sip-domain-certs-05), Vijay K. Gurbani
• [Sip] Authentication of the called party..., Baniel Uri-CUB001
• Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-01, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previousNOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Comments on draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-01, Qian Sun
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previousNOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Bruce Qi
• Jun 21 2007
• Re: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previous NOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Keepalive mechanisms for TCP flows in outbound-08, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Re: outbound-08 : using different Contact URIs for different flows?, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] outbound08 - Handling Responses in Edge proxy / Viavs.Flowtoken, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previous NOTIFYtransaction has completed?, Arunachalam Venkatraman \(arunvenk\)
• [Sip] Comments draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, Willekens, Marc
• [Sip] SIP SAML Comments by Mayutan Arumaithurai, Tschofenig, Hannes
• Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-01, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Comments on draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-01, Qian Sun
• [Sip] SIP SAML Review by Richard Barnes, Richard Barnes
• [Sip] RFC 4916 on Connected Identity in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), rfc-editor
• Jun 20 2007
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previous NOTIFY transaction has completed?, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Could a UA issue a new NOTIFY before the previous NOTIFY transaction has completed?, yan
• RE: [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-02.txt, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• [Sip] sipsec draft, Frank W. Miller
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Fries, Steffen
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Elwell, John
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Frank W. Miller
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Frank W. Miller
• [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: Nits RE: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Jun 19 2007
• Re: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: AW: AW: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 (2006-07)], Byron Campen
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Dean Willis
• Re: AW: AW: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• AW: AW: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Jesske, R
• AW: [Sip] INFO and ISUP, Jesske, R
• [Sip] Comments on draft-ietf-sip-multiple-refer-01.txt, Qian Sun
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Eric Burger
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• [Sip] Re: Questions on XCAP Diff Event draft, Jari Urpalainen
• [Sip] Re: Several notes to entity-tags for SIP Events, Martin Hynar
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Elwell, John
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Jun 18 2007
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• [Sip] SIP SAML Review by Andreas Pashalidis, Hannes Tschofenig
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: AW: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Eric Burger
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] SIP-body-handling Open Issue 3, Eric Burger
• RE: [Sip] INFO and ISUP, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] New draft modifying RFC 4412 for Responses, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] SIP-body-handling Open Issue 3, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Effect of SIP T1 timer value on T4 timer, Jagan Mohan
• RE: [Sip] Effect of SIP T1 timer value on T4 timer, Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
• [Sip] SIP SAML Review by Erkki Koivusalo, Tschofenig, Hannes
• RE: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• AW: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Jesske, R
• [Sip] SIP Saml Review by Marcos Dytz, Tschofenig, Hannes
• [Sip] Effect of SIP T1 timer value on T4 timer, Jagan Mohan
• [Sip] RE: Questions on XCAP Diff Event draft, Sofie Lassborn (TN/EAB)
• RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, Fries, Steffen
• Re: [Sip] INFO usage (or not), Eric Burger
• [Sip] SIP-body-handling Open Issue 3, Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Eric Burger
• [Sip] SIP-body-handling Open Issue 1, Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Eric Burger
• SIP-MIME or MIME? (was Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?), Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Eric Burger
• [Sip] INFO and ISUP, Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Dale . Worley
• Jun 17 2007
• Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, Jiri Kuthan
• [Sip] Forward on request: Be a NOMCOM Volunteer Today, Dean Willis
• Jun 16 2007
• [Sip] New draft modifying RFC 4412 for Responses, James M. Polk
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Sigcomp ASM Tool, Leo Lv
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 4XX instead of 3XX, Francois Audet
• Jun 15 2007
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, simo.veikkolainen
• [Sip] Re: Several notes to entity-tags for SIP Events, Aki Niemi
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Emergency example, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Jun 14 2007
• Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Jeroen van Bemmel
• [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Emergency example, Brian Rosen
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Elwell, John
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] UA Loose Routing: redirect, Salvatore Loreto
• Jun 13 2007
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, Shida Schubert
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Emergency example, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Emergency example, Ted Hardie
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dale Worley
• [Sip] Certificate authentication in SIP, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• [Sip] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, Volker Hilt
• [Sip] INFO usage (or not), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
• [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Emergency example, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility - Path, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Several notes to entity-tags for SIP Events, Martin Hynar
• [Sip] Publication request for draft-ietf-sip-answermode, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] UA Loose Routing: Alternative using P-Called-Party, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] UA loose route issue #2: standardized URI params or not, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] UA Loose Routing Issue #1: Backwards compatibility, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Francois Audet
• Jun 12 2007
• Re: [Sip] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• [Sip] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] WGLC Review: draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, Shida Schubert
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Diego B
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, Erkki.Koivusalo
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Rafferty, James
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-saml-02, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Jun 11 2007
• [Sip] Agenda for Chicago, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Jun 08 2007
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• Jun 08 2007
• [Sip] Proposal for transport=tls, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Spencer Dawkins
• [Sip] WGLC Review: draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, Mary Barnes
• Re: [Sip] Open issue in subnot etags, David Viamonte
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Diego B
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sipping] RE: [Sip] Contradiction in RC 3515 - SIP REFER Method, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Steve Langstaff
• Re: [Sip] Open issue in subnot etags, Avshalom Houri
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Spencer Dawkins
• RE: [Sip] Contradiction in RC 3515 - SIP REFER Method, Gilad Shaham
• [Sip] Contradiction in RC 3515 - SIP REFER Method, Ian Elz (CV/ETL)
• [Sip] Open issue in subnot etags, Aki Niemi
• RE: [Sip] Review of draft-dotson-sip-certificate-auth-sol-00, Erkki.Koivusalo
• RE: [Sip] Review of draft-dotson-sip-certificate-auth-sol-00, Erkki.Koivusalo
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Shida Schubert
• Jun 07 2007
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Jeff Hodges
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Jeroen van Bemmel
• RE: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] clarification: multiple outbound registrations and temporary GRUUs: scope of invalidation, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] GRUU-13 : algorithm in annex A.2 does not distinguish betweenmultiple outbound contacts, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Mary Barnes
• RE: [Sip] Review of draft-dotson-sip-certificate-auth-sol-00, Steve Dotson
• RE: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Erkki.Koivusalo
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Miguel Garcia
• RE: [Sip] Review of draft-dotson-sip-certificate-auth-sol-00, Erkki.Koivusalo
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Dean Willis
• Jun 06 2007
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Vijay K. Gurbani
• [Sip] Anybody reading draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] Re: SIPS draft - Should SIPS and TLS be tightly coupled?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Vijay K. Gurbani
• [Sip] SIPS draft - Should SIPS and TLS be tightly coupled?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughtsontransport=tls?, Gilad Shaham
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughtsontransport=tls?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Jun 05 2007
• RE: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• RE: [Sip] Review of draft-dotson-sip-certificate-auth-sol-00, Steve Dotson
• [Sip] Updated SIP Certificate Authentication requirements draft, Steve Dotson
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Gilad Shaham
• RE: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Server srv records?, Steve Langstaff
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Aki Niemi
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Thomas Froment
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Jun 04 2007
• [Sip] RE: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Francois Audet
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of last hop exception, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughtsontransport=tls?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Server srv records?, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Server srv records?, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] Server srv records?, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] answer a call, caller Id, play info., Matthew Pease
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?, Bob Penfield
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Robert Sparks
• Jun 03 2007
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Dale . Worley
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dale . Worley
• Jun 01 2007
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, simo.veikkolainen
• May 31 2007
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] Treatment of ACK for 2xx final response, Nayak, Subhransu S
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] Treatment of ACK for 2xx final response, Kadirvelu, Kannan \(Kanna\)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Gilad Shaham
• Re: [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] INFO message belongs only to INVITE dialog usage?, Nina Garaca
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] 3pcc controller requirements, SUNIL J. KUMAR
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Sip] MIME: binary data, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• May 30 2007
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] MIME: binary data, Dale . Worley
• [Sip] MIME: binary data, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] RE: MIME: External-body body types, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] Re: MIME: Partial body types, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Re: MIME: External-body body types, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] MIME: External-body body types, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] MIME: Partial body types, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - support of alternative, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - when is it allowed to use alternative?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] Re: Your draft xcap-diff-event:Sending etag information in the Subscribe., Jari Urpalainen
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Alternative and identical Content-Types, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• May 29 2007
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-saml-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - support of alternative, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - support of alternative, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] Deregistration, Malleswara Rao Ankem
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - support of alternative, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - support of alternative, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - S/MIME, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - order of bodies, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• May 28 2007
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - order of bodies, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Alternative and identical Content-Types, Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Dale . Worley
• [Sip] RE: Your draft xcap-diff-event:Sending etag information in the Subscribe., Anders Lindgren C (TN/EAB)
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] MIME: Alternative and identical Content-Types, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME - order of bodies, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] Review of draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, Even, Roni
• [Sip] MIME: Nested bodies with option-tag?, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• [Sip] MIME: Alternative and identical Content-Types, Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• May 27 2007
• Re: [Sip] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-00.txt, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• May 26 2007
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target ornot?, Jeroen van Bemmel
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target or not?, Dale . Worley
• RE: [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 (2006-07)], Lavis Chow
• May 25 2007
• Re: [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 (2006-07)], Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-00.txt, James M. Polk
• [Sip] Out of Office -- Niall Gallagher, Niall_Gallagher
• Re: [Sip] Questions about SDP session-id changes within a SIP dialog., Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Questions about SDP session-id changes within a SIP dialog., David Robinson
• Re: [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target or not?, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Contact header in 1xx responses/updates remote target or not?, Nina Garaca
• [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 (2006-07)], Lavis Chow
• May 24 2007
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-sips-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Sip] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Elwell, John
• [Sip] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-camarillo-sip-body-handling-00.txt, Elwell, John
• May 23 2007
• Re: [Sip] Re: Ambiguity, redirection and Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt, Volker Hilt
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Dan Wing
• Re: [Sip] Re: Ambiguity, redirection and Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt, peter_blatherwick
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Updating contact info for Dean Willis, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Re: Ambiguity, redirection and Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt, Volker Hilt
• May 22 2007
• [Sip] FW: [imtcmembers] IMTC Multimedia Standards Historical Archive - contributions?, Chris Steck
• [Sip] Ambiguity, redirection and Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt, peter_blatherwick
• RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Dale . Worley
• [Sip] Re: Thoughts on your draft xcap-diff-event: synchronization of notifications and XCAP GET, Jari Urpalainen
• [Sip] Thoughts on your draft xcap-diff-event: synchronization of notifications and XCAP GET, Sofie Lassborn \(TN/EAB\)
• RE: [Sip] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt], Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Francois Audet
• May 21 2007
• [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• Re: [Sip] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt], Volker Hilt
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] 3pcc controller requirements, Rayees Khan
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] 3pcc controller requirements, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] 3pcc controller requirements, Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
• May 18 2007
• Re: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Dale . Worley
• May 18 2007
• RE: [Sip] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt], Francois Audet
• RE: Sorry found the answer (RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft), Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] Re: Questions on XCAP Diff Event draft, Jari Urpalainen
• [Sip] Re: Your draft xcap-diff-event:Sending etag information in the Subscribe., Jari Urpalainen
• May 17 2007
• Re: Sorry found the answer (RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Sorry found the answer (RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft), Dean Willis
• [Sip] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt], Volker Hilt
• Re: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Attila Sipos
• Re: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Dean Willis
• Sorry found the answer (RE: [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft), Attila Sipos
• [Sip] sips if possible, sip if not. - a question on sip-sips-03 draft, Attila Sipos
• May 16 2007
• Re: [Sip] Draft revision on SIP UA discovery using Zeroconf, Dale . Worley
• [Sip] FW: [rohc] Last Call: draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip (Applying Signaling Compression (SigComp) to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• [Sip] Notes of second review call on resolution of location-conveyance comments, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Questions on XCAP Diff Event draft, Sofie Lassborn \(TN/EAB\)
• May 15 2007
• [Sip] Xin Sheng Mao/China/IBM is out of the office., Xin Sheng Mao
• Re: [Sip] UAS behaviour in response to a CANCEL request, Dale . Worley
• [Sip] UAS behaviour in response to a CANCEL request, Stephen McVarnock
• [Sip] Your draft xcap-diff-event:Sending etag information in the Subscribe., Anders Lindgren C \(TN/EAB\)
• [Sip] Draft revision on SIP UA discovery using Zeroconf, Jae Woo Lee
• May 14 2007
• RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME, Francois Audet
• Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] SIPit 20 survey summary, Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip] query on sip-outbound and sip-connect-reuse, Paul Kyzivat