Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Mar 21 2002
• RE: [Sip] Codecs selection & QoS reservation--Manyfolks, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] Codecs selection & QoS reservation--Manyfolks, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• [Sip] Codecs selection & QoS reservation--Manyfolks, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• Re: [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Processing CANCEL request at UAS, Dinesh N
• [Sip] Matching requests to server transactions, frank . derks
• Re: [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• RE: [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Mark Watson
• [Sip] Matching request/responses to transactions, Titty Thomas
• RE: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Question on CANCEL - backwards-compatibility, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• [Sip] SIP RFC -reg, Surya Kumar IVG
• [Sip] Re: Manyfolks Clarifications, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Mar 20 2002
• [Sip] RE: Manyfolks Clarifications, Alan O'Neill
• RE: [Sip] REFER Security, Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew)
• [Sip] Version Info in Watcher Info, Sean Olson
• [Sip] REFER Security, Sriramp Parameswar
• RE: [Sip] Reason header simplification, Jean-Francois Mule
• Re: [Sip] Question on CANCEL - backwards-compatibility, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] bis-09 references non existing definition., Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] media coder negociation, Jonathan Rosenberg
• AW: [Sip] question on privacy 04, Ruppelt Christian
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Vijay Gurbani
• Re: [Sip] question on privacy 04, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] Reason header simplification, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: [Sip] media coder negotiation, Even, Roni
• RE: [Sip] comments on privacy-04, Mark Watson
• [Sip] media coder negociation, Guntram Diehl
• [Sip] bis-09 references non existing definition., Christian Jansson
• [Sip] question on privacy 04, Ruppelt Christian
• [Sip] Question on CANCEL - backwards-compatibility, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• [Sip] test don't open,
• [Sip] test don't open,
• Re: [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• RE: [Sip] Reason header and call diversion, Jean-Francois Mule
• [Sip] Re: Manyfolks Clarifications, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Reason header simplification, Jean-Francois Mule
• [Sip] Manyfolks Clarifications, Alan O'Neill
• [Sip] Re: Offer by the callee, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] SIP Change Process, Sean Olson
• Mar 19 2002
• RE: [Sip] Reason header simplification, David R. Oran
• [Sip] Conferencing Bar Ad Hoc, Eric Burger
• Re: [Sip] Reason header simplification, Henning Schulzrinne
• [Sip] REFER ABNF issues, Daniel G. Petrie
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] Reason header simplification, Eric Burger
• [Sip] SIP Change Process, Fairlie-Cuninghame, Robert
• Resubmitted Requests that might not Merge (Was: [Sip] comments on sip-auth), Jo Hornsby
• [Sip] Reason header simplification, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Notes, SIP Session 1 from Vijay Gurbani, Dean Willis
• [Sip] comments on sip-auth, Bob Penfield
• Re: [Sip] update-01 comments, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] Offer by the callee, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• [Sip] update-01 comments, Bob Penfield
• RE: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Eric Burger
• [Sip] update-01: the 155 response and implied errors, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] Supported compact form gone?, Christian Jansson
• Re: [Sip] comments on privacy-04, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] Question on UPDATE after INVITE completion, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Question on UPDATE after INVITE completion, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Henning Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Mark Watson
• [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Mar 18 2002
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] rsvp or manyfolks in 3gpp, jh
• Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Comments on SIP-URL grammar, Ranjit Avasarala
• [Sip] comments on privacy-04, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] Re: REFER security, Arunachalam Venkatraman
• Re: [Sip] 200 UPDATE race condition, Christer Holmberg
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Mark Watson
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Salva Rey Calatayud
• [Sip] Comments on SIP-URL grammar, mkramanna
• Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, William Marshall
• Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Glare with PRACK vs. UPDATE. Was: Question on manyfolks 05, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] 200 UPDATE race condition, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] mayfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: REFER security, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Mar 16 2002
• Re: [Sip] (no subject), Bobby Sardana
• Re: [Sip] WGLC for Update draft, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] (no subject), Aditi Budhraja
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for Update draft, Jo Hornsby
• Mar 15 2002
• Re: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Re: Comments maynfolks-05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• Re: [Sip] Re: Manyfolks: the segmented approach, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] mayfolks, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] question on many-folks-draft05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Re: Manyfolks: the segmented approach, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• [Sip] Re: Manyfolks: the segmented approach, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Henry Sinnreich
• Re: [Sip] question on many-folks-draft05, Salva Rey Calatayud
• Re: [Sip] Last Call comments on manyfolks-05, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] question on many-folks-draft05, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] mayfolks, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• Re: [Sip] transport=tls, mscansh
• [Sip] Does sip need a interface like DOM(Document Object Model )?, albert.wang
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• [Sip] mayfolks, Salva Rey Calatayud
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Brian Williams
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Brian Williams
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• [Sip] test, Qiang Ni
• [Sip] question on many-folks-draft05, Salva Rey Calatayud
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Salva Rey Calatayud
• [Sip] Manyfolks: the segmented approach, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• [Sip] Manyfolks: e2e meaning, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• RE: [Sip] SIP-H.323 Interworking, Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Sip] Proxies Can Modify SDP?, Chris Martin
• Re: [Sip] Re: REFER security, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Re: REFER security, Rohan Mahy
• Mar 14 2002
• [Sip] Last Call comments on manyfolks-05, William Marshall
• [Sip] Question on Locating SIP Servers -06, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: [Sip] SIP Implementation framework, Henry Sinnreich
• RE: [Sip] transport=tls, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] transport=tls, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] Proxies Can Modify SDP?, Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew)
• [Sip] Re: REFER security, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Minor Comment on SIP: Locating SIP Servers : SRV-06, George Foti (LMC)
• [Sip] Re: REFER security, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] transport=tls, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] query, John . Hearty
• [Sip] Re: REFER security, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] query, Prabhas Ranjan Sinha
• AW: [Sip] transport=tls, thomas . nagel
• Re: [Sip] transport=tls, Jari Arkko
• [Sip] SIP Implementation framework, Abdramane Diallo
• RE: [Sip] query, Rosen, Brian
• RE: [Sip] query, Ranjit Avasarala
• RE: [Sip] SIP and SCF, Henry Sinnreich
• RE: [Sip] transport=tls, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] SIP and SCF, Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] transport=tls, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Allison Mankin
• Re: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Allison Mankin
• RE: [Sip] SIP and SCF, Drage, Keith (Keith)
• [Sip] query, anand
• Re: [Sip] transport=tls, Dean Willis
• [Sip] SIP and SCF, Johnal123
• [Sip] transport=tls, Sean Olson
• Mar 13 2002
• [Sip] SIP-H.323 Interworking, gary . m . sacra
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Mark Watson
• [Sip] Another nit, SIP WG Agenda, IETF 53, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Question: Response Context, Ofir Arkin
• RE: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, jmaeng
• Re: [Sip] SIP WG Agenda, IETF 53, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] To tag with 16.6 Request Forwarding, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Kevin Lingle
• Re: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Allison Mankin
• RE: [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Jean-Francois Mule
• Mar 12 2002
• Re:[Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Kevin Lingle
• LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] Why UAS can`t start a second offer before the session is complete??, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Why UAS can`t start a second offer before the session is complete??, Ranjit Avasarala
• Re: [Sip] Why UAS can`t start a second offer before the session is complete??, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] SIP ABNF Grammar bugs?, Hall Bill-P26432
• RE: [Sip] Status of REFER, Alan Johnston
• [Sip] SIP DNS usage issues (draft-ietf-sip-srv-06), ssundaragopalan
• [Sip] Status of REFER, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [Sip] Line folding of Sip Headers, Pramod Vishnu Patil
• RE: [Sip] Behaviour of a UAC on timeout, hisham . khartabil
• [Sip] Behaviour of a UAC on timeout, hisham . khartabil
• Re: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Juan-Carlos . Rojas
• [Sip] Why UAS can`t start a second offer before the session is complete??, Peili Xu
• Mar 11 2002
• Re: [Sip] Definition of WSP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Definition of WSP, Jinyan Su
• RE: [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Alan O'Neill
• Re: [Sip] Replaces and 481, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Replaces and 481, Alan Johnston
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] WGLC for Manyfolks draft, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Line folding of Sip Headers, mgovind
• Re: [Sip] Line folding of Sip Headers, Tom_Gray
• [Sip] Line folding of Sip Headers, mgovind
• [Sip] Re: Reason draft WG item?, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Mar 10 2002
• [Sip] WGLC for Update draft, Dean Willis
• [Sip] WGLC for Privacy Draft, Dean Willis
• [Sip] WGLC for Informational Draft on Media Authorization, Dean Willis
• No Subject, No Author
• [Sip] To tag with 16.6 Request Forwarding, Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] Re: Reason draft WG item?, Dean Willis
• Mar 09 2002
• [Sip] 200 UPDATE race condition, Christer Holmberg
• Mar 08 2002
• [Sip] Reason draft WG item?, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] Change in List Policy, Rosen, Brian
• Re: [Sip] URI and URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] == Feel & Look 10 Years Younger in 10 Weeks With HGH == 33161186544333222221111, libertyHGH331611
• RE: [Sip] URI and URL, Lawrence Conroy
• [Sip] SIP MIB Work Plan, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] URI and URL, Sean Olson
• RE: [Sip] URI and URL, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] URI and URL, Sean Olson
• [Sip] URI and URL, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• [Sip] Re: Clarification regarding the resolution for bug #113(Overlappingtransactions), Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-update-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-guidelines-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] Clarification regarding the resolution for bug #113 (Overlappingtransactions), stoshniwal
• Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Question, SIP SIP
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [SIP] maddr in Via and Request-URI meaning, kimjuna
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Mar 07 2002
• RE: [Sip] Question about differentiation between Strict-Routing and Loose Routing, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] [±¤°í] À̸ÞÀÏ È«º¸ ¸¶ÄÉÆÿ¡ °ü½ÉÀÖÀ¸½ÅºÐ¸¸ º¸¼¼¿ä!!! ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¹ö¸®¼¼¿ä., ¸ÞÀϸ¶ÄÉÆÃ
• [Sip] Protocol Action: SIP: Session Initiation Protocol to ProposedStandard, The IESG
• [Sip] SIP Success, Allison Mankin
• RE: [Sip] Question about differentiation between Strict-Routing and Loose Routing, Rosen, Brian
• [Sip] Question about differentiation between Strict-Routing and Loose Routing, Ofir Arkin
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Question, Prabhas Sinha
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] Glare with PRACK vs. UPDATE. Was: Question on manyfolks 05, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] draft-antti-rfc2806bis-02.txt, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, Mpierce1
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-privacy-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-call-auth-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-dhcp-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] [±¤°í] 10¸¸¿øÀ¸·Î 600¸¸À̸ÞÀÏ+¹ß¼Û±â¸¦ ³»Ç°¾È¿¡..^^;, È«º¸ÆÀ
• RE: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, krisztian . kiss
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, James Undery
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, jh
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] draft-antti-rfc2806bis-02.txt, mgovind
• Mar 06 2002
• Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Bob Penfield
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Henry Sinnreich
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, jh
• [Sip] SDP in unreliable 18x, Christer Holmberg
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, George Foti (LMC)
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-message-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, David R. Oran
• [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, James Undery
• RE: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Mark Watson
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
• AW: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• [Sip] Path header vs. pre-loaded route in Contact, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] Some bis-09 findings, Alexandre Charest
• RE: [Sip] Some bis-09 findings, bernhard . honeisen
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• AW: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mayer Georg
• Re: [Sip] Some bis-09 findings, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-yu-tel-url-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Some bis-09 findings, bernhard . honeisen
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, Steffen Fries
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
• AW: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-events-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• AW: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mayer Georg
• [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• [Sip] To tag question, Christer Holmberg
• RE: [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, James Undery
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• [Sip] Questions to draft-undery-sip-auth-00.txt, Steffen Fries
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Stephen Terrill (ERA)
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Mar 05 2002
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Christian Huitema
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Jonathan Lennox
• Re: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] RE: [Sip] [? ?] ?????? ???? ?????, Rosen, Brian
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] CSeq and Via branch in bis-09, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] RE: [Sip] [? ?] ?????? ???? ?????, James M. Polk
• Re: [Sip] re: Path as WG item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Clarification relating to the Path header usage., Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
• RE: [Sip] RE: [Sip] [? ?] ?????? ???? ?????, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] CSeq and Via branch in bis-09, hisham . khartabil
• RE: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• [Sip] Questions/Comments on privacy-04 draft, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mark Watson
• Re: [Sip] Offer/answer model, Bob Penfield
• RE: [Sip] RE: [Sip] [? ?] ?????? ???? ?????, Rosen, Brian
• [Sip] Offer/answer model, Salva Rey Calatayud
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, James M. Polk
• No Subject, No Author
• Re: [Sip] T4, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] (no subject), James M. Polk
• Mar 04 2002
• Re: [Sip] re: Path as WG item, James M. Polk
• [Sip] RE: [Sip] [광 고] 해외교포들의 한국식품 종합쇼핑몰, Hussam Jarada
• [Sip] [±¤ °í] Çؿܱ³Æ÷µéÀÇ Çѱ¹½ÄÇ° Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθô, HanBay
• RE: [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), Adam Roach
• [Sip] Clarification relating to the Path header usage., stoshniwal
• RE: [Sip] Question on Events-04 draft, Adam Roach
• Re: [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, Mpierce1
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] PRACK question: draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] SIP DNS usage issues (draft-ietf-sip-srv-06), Boris Perlov
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• [Sip] ¡ß Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¹Î°£ºñ¹æ ÀÚ·á[±¤°í], °Ç°­ÁöÅ´ÀÌ
• RE: [Sip] T4, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• RE: [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), hisham . khartabil
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Removing security preconditions from manyfolks, David R. Oran
• RE: [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common o peration for both directions, David R. Oran
• Mar 03 2002
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• [Sip] WG adoption of Update method, Dean Willis
• RE:Dialog Tunnelling == bad (Was: [SIP] Event ID), Michael Purcell
• [Sip] (no subject), SIP SIP
• [Sip] Question bis 07: "response retransmissions" for none-INVITE transaction, Fuxbruner, Amihay
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, SIP SIP
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, SIP SIP
• [Sip] Question on Events-04 draft, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Consensus poll on draft-ietf-sip-privacy-04.txt, Chris Martin
• Mar 02 2002
• [Sip] Consensus poll on draft-ietf-sip-privacy-04.txt, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Dean Willis
• [Sip] re: Path as WG item, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• RE: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, George Foti (LMC)
• [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, jh
• Re: [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Mart Nurmet
• Mar 01 2002
• [Sip] Path to Working Group Item, Rosen, Brian
• [Sip] (no subject), Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Manyfolks 05, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Path header: Independent operation in each direction, or common o peration for both directions, George Foti (LMC)
• RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Henry Sinnreich
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
• RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Tom_Gray
• RE: Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Alan Johnston
• Home Extension Service was Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Tom_Gray
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-09.txt,.ps,.pdf, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-srv-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-events-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, hisham . khartabil
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] [±¤°í]¿©·¯ºÐÀÇ ÀÒ¾î¹ö¸° ÇູÀÇ º¹±îÁö ã¾Æµå¸³´Ï´Ù., ¿î»ê
• [Sip] [±¤°í]¿±±âÀü¹® ¼îÇθô, ¿±±â¼¥
• Feb 28 2002
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
• Re: [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] UPDATE versus (re)INVITE, Cullen Jennings
• [Sip] RE:, Mark Watson
• [Sip] (no subject), Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, Mark Watson
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] NOTIFY behaviour, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] Section 5.2 of manyfolks, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Bob Penfield
• [Sip] RE: NOTIFY behaviour, William Marshall
• [Sip] RE: NOTIFY behaviour, Adam Roach
• RE: [Simple] RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-events-04; Questions, Adam Roach
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Question regarding event-04, Adam Roach
• Re: [Sip] T4, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] NOTIFY behaviour, hisham . khartabil
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Prabhas Sinha
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Mark Taylor
• [Sip] RE: Remote-Party-Id extensibility, Mark Watson
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Bob Penfield
• Re: [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Multiple 200 OKs for an INVITE, Ofir Arkin
• [Sip] Question regarding event-04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• [Sip] Expires in 2xx response to SUBSCRIBE (Events-04), hisham . khartabil
• RE: [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
• RE: [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Tan Ya-Ching ICM N PG U ID A 1
• [Sip] Let's discuss a change in the bis. WAS: Why Proxies are Good andB2BUAs May Not Be, thomas . nagel
• Re: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Jari Arkko
• RE: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Steffen Fries
• RE: [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] S/MIME in SIP, Steffen Fries
• Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), Chris Martin
• [Sip] (no subject), customer_service at childcareprograms.com
• [Sip] Remote-Party-Id extensibility, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] Irrelevant nit on call-id and IPs, Cullen Jennings
• Feb 27 2002
• [Sip] UPDATE Method & Glare, George Foti (LMC)
• Re: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), Dean Willis
• Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Dean Willis
• [Sip] [À̺¥Æ®±¤°í]¹«·á ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ÇϽøé ÇØ¿Ü ¹«·á ¿©Çà±ÇÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù., ¿©Çà°¡ÀÚ
• Re: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] AW: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be --> NO, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-events-04; Questions, Chiou, Mark
• Re: [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Sean Olson
• RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
• [Sip] Question about Section 12.2 Requests within a Dialog, Ofir Arkin
• Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] New Version: draft-ietf-sip-events-04 complete, Adam Roach
• Re: [Sip] Question about section 12.2.2 bis-08, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Question about section 12.2.2 bis-08, Ofir Arkin
• Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
• RE: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, James Undery
• RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), jh
• Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Robert Sparks
• RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenari o outside of 3GPP requirements), Mark Watson
• Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Lennox
• Re: [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Jonathan Lennox
• Re: [Sip] SIP version related statement in bis-08, Gabor Fenyes
• [Sip] SIP version related statement in bis-08, sshetti
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] bis-08 is born, Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, jh
• RE: [Sip] multicast restricted to ttl=1, David R. Oran
• RE: [Sip] T4, hisham . khartabil
• RE: [Sip] Manyfolks version 04, Chen, Xin (Xin)
• Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: SDP in 1xx responses, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
• Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body, Pete Cordell
• Re: Why Proxies are Good and B2BUAs May Not Be (was Re: [Sip] bis-07.9: proxies are not allowed to modify message body), Pete Cordell
• Re: [Sip] Draft -08 comments, part 3: "major" issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: 3GPP Arch. Why use a local proxy? (was Re: [Sip] Path scenario outside of 3GPP requirements), jh
• Re: [Sip] a couple problems in draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-07.9, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] 491 Retry-After missing bis 07, Jonathan Rosenberg