Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Feb 04 2002
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 BNF issues, Henning Schulzrinne
• [Sip] Question about SIP and Cisco 3600 router??, Qiang Ni
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Report an error on BYE, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Report an error on BYE, Dror
• [Sip] Some more ABNF issues - bis07, Dror
• Re: [Sip] final "unify" rules for bis, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] bis-07 now available, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] * To help your business succeed, L Mi
• Re: [Sip] Some sipbis-06 ABNF syntax issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] final "unify" rules for bis, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Some sipbis-06 ABNF syntax issues, Bill Fenner
• Re: [Sip] more BNF issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] more BNF issues, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 BNF issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] more BNF issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 BNF issues, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Some sipbis-06 ABNF syntax issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Possible errors in BNF definition in bis-06, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 BNF issues, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Feb 03 2002
• [Sip] more BNF issues, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] S/MIME, Authentication and Integrity, Jari Arkko
• [Sip] Some sipbis-06 ABNF syntax issues, Bill Fenner
• [Sip] possible fix for SWS definition, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] bis-06 BNF issues, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Possible errors in BNF definition in bis-06, Dror
• [Sip] Re: further comments on bis-06, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] Global Redirect, Marcelo Leite
• [Sip] further comments on bis-06, William Marshall
• [Sip] bis-06 comments, Anders Kristensen
• Feb 02 2002
• Re: [Sip] privacy draft and calling vs called, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] privacy draft and calling vs called, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] [Fwd: WG Last Call for Offer/Answer], Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Active Discussions, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Active Discussions, steve steinberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Global Redirect, Dean Willis
• Re: SIP Spam Prevention (was Re: [Sip] calling number blocking at sip/isup ga..., Dean Willis
• [Sip] Yet more bis-06 comments/nits, John . Hearty
• Feb 01 2002
• Re: [Sip] Discussion of draft-ietf-sip-privacy-03 issues., Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] Global Redirect, Marcelo Leite
• [Sip] What to look for in bis draft, Dean Willis
• [Sip] More bis-06 comments/nits, John . Hearty
• [Sip] Comments on bis-06, Jo Hornsby
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Sanjoy Sen
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Eric Rescorla
• [Sip] ÇǺαâÃÊÈ£Àå NO ºñ¸¸´ÙÀ̾îÆ®NO, ½ÇÅ©½ºÅ¸
• [Sip] AT&T IPR Statement, Frost, Thomas F (Tom), ALIPM
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Christer Holmberg
• No Subject, No Author
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, mielias
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, sdhar
• [Sip] Comments on bis-06, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• No Subject, No Author
• [Sip] The TLS and IPSEC debate, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Sip] bis-06 comments/nits, John . Hearty
• Jan 31 2002
• [Sip] SIP bis RFC Work Plan and Call for Review Help, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Christian Huitema
• No Subject, No Author
• [Sip] privacy draft and calling vs called, Terry L Anderson
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Sanjoy Sen
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Sasha Ruditsky
• Re: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] updated offer/answer draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] RE: The right solution to sip routing, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] MUST for digest, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] MUST for digest, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Michael Thomas
• Jan 30 2002
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Sanjoy Sen
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Sasha Ruditsky
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Alan Johnston
• Re: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] SIP and PKI, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] new Register DoS attack, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Mpierce1
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] Discussion of draft-ietf-sip-privacy-03 issues., Tom-PT Taylor
• RE: [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Rosen, Brian
• RE: [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Jo Hornsby
• RE: [Sip] new Register DoS attack, James Undery
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] TLS, IPSec and consensus (bug #232), Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] The right solution to sip routing, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] new Register DoS attack, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] TLS vs IPsec, Peterson, Jon
• IPSEC with 3G mobiles idea (was Re: [Sip] TLS section), Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] TLS vs IPsec, Henning Schulzrinne
• [Sip] ambiguities with S/MIME, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] TLS vs IPsec, Rohan Mahy
• Jan 29 2002
• [Sip] Discussion of draft-ietf-sip-privacy-03 issues., Dean Willis
• [Sip] Security with TCP, UDP, and ..., Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Dean Willis
• [Sip] one more 3G consideration, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Henry Sinnreich
• RE: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Henry Sinnreich
• [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Christer Holmberg
• IPSEC with 3G mobiles idea (was Re: [Sip] TLS section), Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] Summary of TLS discussion, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Cullen Jennings
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, John . Hearty
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, bernhard . honeisen
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Rosen, Brian
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Mpierce1
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Mpierce1
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-06.txt,.ps,.pdf, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] IESG requirements (was Re: TLS section), Allison Mankin
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Jari Arkko
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Jari Arkko
• [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] RE: Review of draft-ietf-sip-mib-03.txt Part 2, Tom-PT Taylor
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] RE: Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• Re: [Sip] Re: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-components-01, George Smith
• Re: [Sip] TLS section, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] Re: Review of draft-ietf-sip-mib-03.txt Part 2, Kevin Lingle
• [Sip] Bis-06 and Deprecating UDP, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• Jan 28 2002
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Rosen, Brian
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Rosen, Brian
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 now available!, James M. Polk
• RE: [Sip] TLS section, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] SIP and PKI, Michael Thomas
• [Sip] TLS is not a "transport", Michael Thomas
• [Sip] TLS section, Michael Thomas
• RE: [Sip] S/MIME, Authentication and Integrity, Peterson, Jon
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Sanjoy Sen
• RE: [Sip] S/MIME, Authentication and Integrity, James Undery
• RE: [Sip] S/MIME, Authentication and Integrity, Peterson, Jon
• [Sip] new Register DoS attack, James Undery
• [Sip] S/MIME, Authentication and Integrity, James Undery
• [Sip] bis-06 now available!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Jan 27 2002
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-components-01, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] [±¤°í] µ· µÇ´Â »ç¾÷Á¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù, â¾÷Á¤º¸
• Jan 26 2002
• [Sip] Polyglot Translation רҵ·­Òë, info
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Christer Holmberg
• Jan 25 2002
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Dean Willis
• [Sip] draft-rosenberg-sip-app-components-01, De Leo Walter
• RE: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Alan Johnston
• RE: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Alan Johnston
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, John . Hearty
• No Subject, No Author
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, William Marshall
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] how do we handle 911 call originated by SIP user?, Rosen, Brian
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, William Marshall
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Mark Watson
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-srv-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transactionID, Brett Tate
• Re: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transactionID, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft - Part II, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transactionID, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments and suggestions to draft-ietf-sip-nat-01.txt, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft - Part II, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] 1-of-N codecs + inband DTMF, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transactionID, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft - Part II, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning Schulzrinne
• [Sip] Open Issue #368: Outbound proxy handling, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Open Issue #284: Forming the Request-URI when using a Default Outbound Proxy, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Open Issue #161 - called party usage of local outbound proxies with RR, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Open Issue #218: Ordering of maddr, route, domain processing inproxies, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] open issues addressed by looseroute (Open issue #159), Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Regarding Encrytion of SIP messages, Michael Thomas
• Jan 24 2002
• RE: [Sip] RE: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Chiou, Mark
• [Sip] RE: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Holdrege, Matt
• Re: [Sip] Regarding Encrytion of SIP messages, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Regarding Encrytion of SIP messages, Michael Thomas
• FW: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Terry L Anderson
• RE: [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #268 : port number and maddr, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Chiou, Mark
• Re: [Sip] Regarding Encrytion of SIP messages, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transactionID, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: Unify draft and 1-of-N, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] update to draft-ietf-sip-srv, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] calling number blocking at sip/isup gateway, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] Unify draft and 1-of-N, Terry L Anderson
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #268 : port number and maddr, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jay Batson
• Re: [Sip] 1-of-N codecs + inband DTMF, Gonzalo Camarillo
• [Sip] query, Sumit Kansal
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #144: Branch ID + isCancel() as transaction ID, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Regarding MIME content handling, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Regarding MIME content handling, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Regarding Encrytion of SIP messages, Mukesh R Shah
• [Sip] Regarding MIME content handling, Mukesh R Shah
• [Sip] 1-of-N codecs + inband DTMF, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Syntax questions regarding draft-ietf-sip-privacy-03.txt, Flemming Andreasen
• Jan 23 2002
• [Sip] Comments on Resource Priority Header, Mpierce1
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #268 : port number and maddr, Vijay Gurbani
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] problem with sip resonse code mapping to isup, Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Sip] problem with sip resonse code mapping to isup, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] problem with sip resonse code mapping to isup, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Open Issue #268 : port number and maddr, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Vijay Gurbani
• RE: [Sip] Questions for Loose Route example, Robert Sparks
• Jan 22 2002
• [Sip] Syntax questions regarding draft-ietf-sip-privacy-03.txt, Joel Rosenfield
• RE: [Sip] Very ROUGH thinking on DNS/SRV usage, Orit Levin
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, William Marshall
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Abbie Barbir
• [Sip] ADV: Professional Internet Marketing, sydney
• Re: [Sip] cooperate with Megaco?, Matt Holdrege
• [Sip] Questions for Loose Route example, bernhard . honeisen
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, bernhard . honeisen
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Sean Olson
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Sean Olson
• [Sip] cooperate with Megaco?, Lei Liang
• [Sip] problem with sip resonse code mapping to isup, Juha Heinanen
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, bernhard . honeisen
• [Sip] Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
• [Sip] Confirmation for subscribe ietf-announce, Majordomo
• Jan 21 2002
• Re: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Re: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä[È«º¸], Ä£±¸¿¡°Ô
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, John . Hearty
• Re: [Sip] MAJOR Open Issue #184: Message size limitations, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Dean Willis
• [Sip] Re: "unify" draft: problem with upstream 407, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä[È«º¸], Ä£±¸¿¡°Ô
• [Sip] bis-draft: minor issues in Table 2 and 3, Drage, Keith (Keith)
• [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft - Part II, Christer Holmberg
• Jan 20 2002
• Re: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Christer Holmberg
• Jan 18 2002
• [Sip] [±¤°í]BMW 7980¿ø,³ëÆ®ºÏ 2250¿ø, ÇÁ¶ó´Ù ¼ñ´õ¹é 6500¿ø¿¡ À常ÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù, DC90
• [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP, Vijay K. Gurbani
• [Sip] Guys, I have a suggestion., Odyssey
• [Sip] A good search utility to search this lists archives., Padhye, Chinmay
• RE: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP URI., Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] how do we handle 911 call originated by SIP user?, Tom_Gray
• Re: [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP URI., Mpierce1
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, adam . roach
• [Sip] Re: [Sipping] how do we handle 911 call originated by SIP user?, Info Van
• [Sip] "unify" draft: problem with upstream 407, Rohan Mahy
• RE: [Sip] Open issue #100: case sensitivity of URL parameter values, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Issues with telephone-subscriber appearing in a SIP URI., Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] how do we handle 911 call originated by SIP user?, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, John . Hearty
• [Sip] how do we handle 911 call originated by SIP user?, Info Van
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Juha Heinanen
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Dean Willis
• [Sip] [±¤°í] Èû°Ü¿ü´ø ¿µ¾î! ÀÌÁ¦ ´Ù½Ã ½ÃÀÛÇϽʽÿÀ., ¾ÆÀÌ·¯ºêÀ×±Û¸®½¬
• Re: [Sip] MAJOR Open Issue #184: Message size limitations, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Juha Heinanen
• [Sip] Re: open issue #290: registrar increasing lifetime, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Brett Tate
• RE: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-existing Route headers, Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew)
• [Sip] re: open issue #290: registrar increasing lifetime, Rohan Mahy
• [Sip] Comments on "unify" draft, Rohan Mahy
• Re: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-exist ing Route headers, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-exist ing Route headers, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Jan 17 2002
• [Sip] DEPRECATION WARNING: BYE without tags!!!!!!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #366: sip v. tel URL, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] MAJOR Open Issue #184: Message size limitations, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, Brett Tate
• Re: [Sip] bis-06 release date?, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #351: non-SIP URL as AOR, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] solving early media, HERFP, and unifying manyfolks, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, John . Hearty
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-replaces-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Dean Willis
• Re: [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Christer Holmberg
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Robert Sparks
• Jan 16 2002
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Question of looseroute draft, Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] confirm 922915, Carlos F. Gonzalez De Requena
• [Sip] SIP RFC2543: 1 new MIB object to deal with Expires header, Jean-Francois Mule
• [Sip] minor editorial nits in SIP RFC2543 bis-05: Expires header, Jean-Francois Mule
• [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-replaces-00.txt, Rohan Mahy
• Re: [Sip] [bis-05] Table 3 and the Supported header, Bob Penfield
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] "Replaces" header work on SIP charter, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] [bis-05] Table 3 and the Supported header, Drage, Keith (Keith)
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Honeisen Bernhard (NET/Helsinki)
• [Sip] bis-06 release date?, pnath
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Brett Tate
• [Sip] [bis-05] Table 3 and the user-agent header, sshetti
• Jan 15 2002
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] [bis-05] Table 3 and the Supported header, Alan Johnston
• RE: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-existing Route headers, Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew)
• RE: [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Honeisen Bernhard (NET/Helsinki)
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] [bis-05] Table 3 and the Supported header, Drage, Keith (Keith)
• RE: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-existing Route headers, Neil Deason
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-sparks-sip-looseroute-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [SIP] Use of Branch parameter within Via headers, Jiri Kuthan
• Jan 14 2002
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] [홍보] 네티즌이 만든 검색엔진 아이따따따입니다., 아이따따따
• Re: [SIP] Use of Branch parameter within Via headers, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Sean Olson
• [Sip] Minutes, SIP WG, IETF 52, Dean Willis
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Attention - comment on Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• No Subject, No Author
• [SIP] Use of Branch parameter within Via headers, Robert Osborne
• Jan 13 2002
• [Sip] testing - please ignore, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Jan 11 2002
• Re: [Sip] Bug #113 Overlapping transactions, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Bug #113 Overlapping transactions, Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Sip] Bug #113 Overlapping transactions, Sean Olson
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Loose Routing draft, bernhard . honeisen
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #207: Handling of session failures, John . Hearty
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #207: Handling of session failures, Christer Holmberg
• [Sip] Loose Routing draft, Robert Sparks
• [Sip] Bug #113 Overlapping transactions, Peterson, Jon
• Jan 10 2002
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, Charles Eckel
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registrationlife time, Ben Campbell
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #207: Handling of session failures, John . Hearty
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Sean Olson
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #178: Deprecate absolute times absolutely: S PEAK UP IFYOU USE THEM IN YOUR PRODUCT!!!!!!!!!!, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #207: Handling of session failures, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #290: Registrar increasing registration life time, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #370: RTT estimates for 2xx retransmits, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #139: re-INVITE Glare, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] simple-presence-04, Aymeric MOIZARD
• Re: [Sip] rfc2543bis.05 Content-Disposition., Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Re: changing of media types allowed in offer/answer and SIP open issue #24, Hiroshi Waki
• Jan 09 2002
• [Sip] (no subject), Purcell Michael-QA3001
• [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-robinson-mrcp-sip-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Tom-PT Taylor
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Brett Tate
• [Sip] Re: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip] RE: [Sip-implementors] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Paul Long
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #259: Proxies Honoring Expires, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), adam . roach
• Re: [Sip] Open Issue #259: Proxies Honoring Expires, Jonathan Lennox
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Bob Penfield
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jiri Kuthan
• [Sip] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] Post Dial Delay, Henning Schulzrinne
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), William Marshall
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), kbinu
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jo Hornsby
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] bis draft: Minor NIT on Supported header, Christer Holmberg
• RE: [Sip] Still issues with preconditions, Alan O'Neill
• Re: [Sip] Post Dial Delay, mgovind
• [Sip] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Jonathan Rosenberg
• [Sip] Post Dial Delay, ShavinderPal Singh
• No Subject, No Author
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jiri Kuthan
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jiri Kuthan
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jiri Kuthan
• Jan 08 2002
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Bob Penfield
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Bob Penfield
• Re: [Sip] Priority header, James M. Polk
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Robert Sparks
• Re: [Sip] Priority header, Henning G. Schulzrinne
• Re: [Sip] Priority header, Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), John . Hearty
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), adam . roach
• [Sip] Re: [MMUSIC] RE: [Sip-implementors] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• RE: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-existing Route headers, Chiou, Mark
• [Sip] Re: [MMUSIC] Re: [Sip-implementors] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• [Sip] Re: [MMUSIC] supporting just one codec at a time, Flemming Andreasen
• Re: [Sip] bis draft: Minor NIT on Supported header, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: Deprecate loop detection, was: Re: [Sip] bis draft: Pre-existing Route headers, Cullen Jennings
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), Robert Sparks
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), adam . roach
• Re: [Sip] bis draft: Headers in 100 Trying (was "Minor NIT on Sup ported header"), Jonathan Rosenberg
• RE: [Sip] Default value for Timer C (was #282), adam . roach