Session Initiation Protocol Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Oct 23 2009
- Oct 21 2009
- Oct 20 2009
- Oct 15 2009
- Oct 12 2009
- Oct 11 2009
- Oct 07 2009
- Sep 30 2009
- Sep 23 2009
- Sep 22 2009
- Sep 17 2009
- Sep 13 2009
- Sep 10 2009
- Sep 09 2009
- Sep 02 2009
- Sep 01 2009
- Aug 31 2009
- Aug 28 2009
- Aug 27 2009
- Aug 25 2009
- Aug 24 2009
- Aug 18 2009
- Aug 17 2009
- Aug 14 2009
- Aug 13 2009
- Aug 12 2009
- Aug 11 2009
- Aug 09 2009
- Aug 07 2009
- Aug 06 2009
- Aug 05 2009
- Aug 04 2009
- Aug 03 2009
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, T Satyanarayana-A12694
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, T Satyanarayana-A12694
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Karunesh Sharma
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, T Satyanarayana-A12694
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Karunesh Sharma
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Karunesh Sharma
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Karunesh Sharma
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Dialog Match, Karunesh Sharma
- Aug 02 2009
- Aug 01 2009
- Jul 31 2009
- Jul 29 2009
- Jul 13 2009
- Jul 09 2009
- Jul 08 2009
- Jul 07 2009
- Jul 06 2009
- Jun 23 2009
- Jun 17 2009
- Jun 10 2009
- Jun 10 2009
- Jun 09 2009
- Jun 08 2009
- Jun 05 2009
- Jun 04 2009
- Jun 02 2009
- May 28 2009
- May 27 2009
- [Sip] Not my day for tidy; draft-ietf-sip-xcapevent-07 submitted, Dean Willis
- [Sip] More on xcapevent -06, Dean Willis
- [Sip] Revised xcapevent to -06, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Draft ietf-sip-xcapevent revised, many open questions, Byron Campen
- Re: [Sip] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-outbound-17, Black_David
- [Sip] [sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-outbound-18.txt, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft ietf-sip-xcapevent revised, many open questions, Jari Urpalainen
- [Sip] Draft ietf-sip-xcapevent revised, many open questions, Dean Willis
- May 26 2009
- May 22 2009
- May 20 2009
- May 20 2009
- May 19 2009
- May 12 2009
- May 11 2009
- May 07 2009
- May 06 2009
- May 01 2009
- Apr 27 2009
- Apr 24 2009
- Apr 16 2009
- Apr 15 2009
- Apr 14 2009
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Munjo Yu
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Adam Roach
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Adam Roach
- Re: [Sip] Fwd: [RAI] SIP and SIPPING, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Fwd: [RAI] SIP and SIPPING, Vijay K. Gurbani
- [Sip] Fwd: [RAI] SIP and SIPPING, Dean Willis
- [Sip] SIPCORE and DISPATCH have been approved - Please see the RAI list for more info, Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Adam Roach
- Apr 13 2009
- Re: [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] bug #1 in draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 grammar, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Dale Worley
- [Sip] bug #2 in draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 grammar, Florian Zumbiehl
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] bug #1 in draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 grammar, Rohan Mahy
- Re: [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Dale Worley
- [Sip] bug #1 in draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 grammar, Florian Zumbiehl
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications suchas Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Andrew Allen
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- [Sip] bug in draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15 grammar, Florian Zumbiehl
- Apr 12 2009
- Apr 11 2009
- Apr 10 2009
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Apr 09 2009
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- [Sip] Registration for SIPIt 24 closes in 3 weeks., Robert Sparks
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-199-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
- [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-08, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-07: 199 response and local ringtone generation, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-07: 199 response and local ringtone generation, Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Tan, Ya Ching (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 - comment onsection 7, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 - comment onsection 7, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Tan, Ya Ching (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 - comment onsection 7, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications suchas Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications suchas Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), marianne.mohali
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jon Peterson
- Apr 08 2009
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 - comment on section 7, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 - comment on section 7, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Publication request for draft-ietf-sip-eku, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Tan, Ya Ching (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Francois Audet
- [Sip] Clarification on RFC 4458: SIP URIs for Applications such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [Sip] Publication request for draft-ietf-sip-domain-certs, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-eku-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-domain-certs-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Apr 07 2009
- [Sip] Publication request for draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Attila Sipos
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Francois Audet
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Apr 06 2009
- Apr 05 2009
- Apr 04 2009
- Apr 03 2009
- [Sip] RFC 5479 on Requirements and Analysis of Media Security Management Protocols, rfc-editor
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] My take on where we are with Identity, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- [Sip] My take on where we are with Identity, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, John C Klensin
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Munjo Yu
- Apr 02 2009
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Keith Moore
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] Media vs Signaling identity (was Re: francois' comments andwhy RFC4474 not used in the field), Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- [Sip] Mlab Tools, henry at sinnreich.net
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, henry at sinnreich.net
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dwight, Timothy M (Tim)
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Keith Moore
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Keith Moore
- Re: [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, eburger
- [Sip] Proposal of Non-Sequential Group Notion in ABNF w/ a SIP case, Munjo Yu
- Apr 01 2009
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dwight, Timothy M (Tim)
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dwight, Timothy M (Tim)
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-barnes-sip-rfc4244bis-00.txt, Mary Barnes
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dwight, Timothy M (Tim)
- Re: [Sip] Media vs Signaling identity (was Re: francois' comments andwhy RFC4474 not used in the field), Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] Media vs Signaling identity (was Re: francois' comments andwhy RFC4474 not used in the field), Elwell, John
- [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07, Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- [Sip] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-13, Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Mar 31 2009
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] Media vs Signaling identity (was Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field), Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] secure-call-id vs. session-id, L.Liess
- [Sip] secure-call-id vs. session-id, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- [Sip] Media vs Signaling identity (was Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field), Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Mar 30 2009
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Michael Procter
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Uzelac, Adam
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Anthony D Pike
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dan Wing
- Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Dean Willis
- Mar 29 2009
- Mar 28 2009
- [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] [Geopriv] Geo URI and privacy URI, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- [Sip] B2BUA's changing call-id's: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Hadriel Kaplan
- [Sip] Completion of draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-06, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Mar 27 2009
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Adam Roach
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, L.Liess
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, L.Liess
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, steve.norreys
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, marianne.mohali
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Doken, Serhad
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Doken, Serhad
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Doken, Serhad
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Shida Schubert
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, R.Jesske
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Bharrat, Shaun
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Uzelac, Adam
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Bob Penfield
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Hadriel Kaplan
- Mar 26 2009
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Mary Barnes
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Venkatesh
- Re: [Sip] draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-02, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Re: [Sip] draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-02, L.Liess
- [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep, Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] draft-boulton-sip-endpoint-view-00, Chris Boulton
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), aayush bhatnagar
- [Sip] FW: [Sipping] Slides for SIP and SIPPING sessions, Mary Barnes
- Mar 25 2009
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Venkatesh
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Venkatesh
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Spencer Dawkins
- [Sip] draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Dale Worley
- [Sip] The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] Reminder: SIPit24 registration closes April 30, Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] Diagnostic idea, Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [Sip] Diagnostic idea, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] Diagnostic idea, Victor Pascual Ávila
- Re: [Sip] Diagnostic idea, L.Liess
- Re: [Sip] Diagnostic idea, Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), aayush bhatnagar
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] draft-state-sip-relay-attack-00, Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [Sip] Is REFER within dialog part of INVITE or subscription usage? (was RE: SIP INFO), Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (1742), RFC Errata System
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] I-D Inaction: draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] comments on draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Dale Worley
- Re: [Sip] SIP Tracing Facility, Dale Worley
Mail converted by MHonArc
