Re: [Sip] Clarification on overlapping transaction in bis07

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>]

Sanjoy Sen wrote:
> 
> lines 1857-1860: A TU MUST NOT initiate a new regular transaction within
> a dialog
>    while a regular transaction is in progress (in either direction)
>    within that dialog. If there is a non-INVITE client or server
>    transaction in progress the TU MUST wait until this transaction
>    enters the completed or the terminated state to initiate the new
>    transaction.
> 
> What is the difference between these two sentences ?

The second one helps clarify what "in progress" means. However, the
whole thing is out of date, since we did decide, based on #113, to allow
overlapping non-invite. We have already corrected this error.

Thanks,

-Jonathan R.


-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.            72 Eagle Rock Avenue
Chief Scientist                         First Floor
dynamicsoft                             East Hanover, NJ 07936
jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com                 FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                  PH:  (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip