Re: LC comment on update-01, was Re: [Sip] Question on manyfolks 05

[Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se>]

Hi,

William Marshall wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, since offers in PRACK cannot be rejected, I would rule them
> > out completely... yes, this is less efficient, but I still think it is
> > the right thing to do.
> 
> is this the start of rfc3262bis-00?

There is not such an RFC in the archives, so there is no reason for a
bis.
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt

Regarding
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-100rel-06.txt

You are right that we may need a small modification. If this suggestion
was taken into account, it would be necessary to remove the following
lines from the draft:

"If the UAC receives
   a reliable provisional response with an answer, it MAY generate an
   additional offer in the PRACK. If the UAS receives a PRACK with an
   offer, it MUST place the answer in the 2xx to the PRACK."

But it may be too late for doing so, so we may have to live without
refusing offers in PRACKs.

Regards,

Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip