[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] update-01 comments

To: <sip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sip] update-01 comments
From: "Bob Penfield" <bpenfield@acmepacket.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:15:31 -0500
Cc: "Jonathan Rosenberg" <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
References: <006101c1cf5e$207ca680$b5b53fa6@acmepacket.com>
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org

One more comment.

This may have already been covered by other comments, but I could not find a
requirement that the UAC MUST receive the 200 OK to the PRACK for the 155
response before sending an UPDATE.

cheers,
(-:bob

Robert F. Penfield
Chief Software Architect
Acme Packet, Inc.
130 New Boston Street
Woburn, MA 01801
bpenfield@acmepacket.com



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sip] update-01 comments
  - From: Jonathan Rosenberg

References:
- [Sip] update-01 comments
  - From: Bob Penfield

Prev by Date: [Sip] Offer by the callee
Next by Date: [Sip] comments on sip-auth
Previous by thread: [Sip] update-01 comments
Next by thread: Re: [Sip] update-01 comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread