Re: [Sip] Record-Route, Path, Service Route, and Multi-Homed Proxies

["Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@lucent.com>]

Dean Willis wrote:
> Wow! Thanks! It's been  along time since I've done anything eminently
> reasonable!
Law of averages, Dean; law of averages :-)
I am still waiting for me to do something eminently reasonable.

> Well, the Service-Route specification is a "new" I-D. Actually, it's
> completed WGLC and is awaiting final IESG review. Miguel and Gonzalo
> raised some valid concerns that it is not as useful as they want. They
> want to use it in conjunction with Path (currently in the rfc-ed queue).
> Path refers to Record-Route behavior. So the proposed behavior would
> probably need to be described in the Service-Route draft in order to
> keep Service-Route from being blocked on 3261bis.
I was afraid you would say so.  Although, for whatever it is worth, I
really wish we would do it in rfc3261bis, but if we cannot, so be it.
Maybe, when the time comes, we can replicate whatever is in the
Service-Route draft on multi-homed proxies in rfc3261bis -- just to
keep information in one place.

Regards,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani  vkg@{lucent.com,research.bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Wireless Networks Group/Internet Software and Services
Lucent Technologies/Bell Labs Innovations, 2000 Lucent Lane, Rm 6G-440
Naperville, Illinois 60566     Voice: +1 630 224 0216

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip