RE: [Sip] Record-Route, Path, Service Route, and Multi-Homed Prox ies

["Dean Willis" <dean.willis@softarmor.com>]

> 
> So what if we needed to do a re-write for SIGCOMP reasons, or 
> SIP/SIPS reasons. It seems that regarding RR is unavoidable. Rgds/gf
> 

Perhaps. Could you make the examples more obvious. I'm apparently
suffering from a clue deficiency this morning.

You need to change the record-route header field in response processing
to allow sigcomp? I would think one might compress the R-R like all
(other header fields) but I'm currently not cognizant of a situation
where it would need to be semantically analyzed and changed . . . Of
course I may just not be particularly cognizant at the moment, if ever.

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip