[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Sip] WGLC (official) for scvrtdisco



Yes, we should add a reference to the Path draft. This can be easily
done in Authors 48 if we don't have any other changes that necessitate a
revision before then -- and by then, we would hope that Path (currently
in RFC Editor Queue) has an RFC number.

Good catch.

--
Dean

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-admin@ietf.org [mailto:sip-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Bob Penfield
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:55 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] WGLC (official) for scvrtdisco 
> 
> 
> The draft mentions the Path header (twice) in section 6.2:
> 
>   "While in itself harmless, this complicates matters for 
> nodes that use
>    the recorded route vector (or recorded Path vector) in the
>    determination of a service route for future use."
> 
> and
> 
>   "Instead of following the procedure in RFC 3261 [4], 
> proxies used with
>    Service-Route that are inserting Record-Route or Path header field
>    values SHOULD record not one but two route values when 
> processing the
>    request."
> 
> There is no reference to the Path draft/RFC. Should it say 
> Service-Route vector/header instead? However, given the 
> SHOULD NOT about proxies modifying the Service-Route header, 
> Path might be correct, but the discussion seems to be more 
> appropriate to the Path draft/RFC.
> 
> cheers,
> (-:bob
> 
> Robert F. Penfield
> Chief Software Architect
> Acme Packet, Inc.
> 130 New Boston Street
> Woburn, MA 01801
> bpenfield@acmepacket.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current 
> sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the 
> application of sip
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip