Re: [Sip] B2BUA question.

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>]

We added the term to the spec since it was used so much in other places, 
we wanted to have a concrete definition so people wouldn't be confused.

-Jonathan R.

Padhye, Chinmay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 	This is from the definition of B2BUA from RFC 3261 -
>
> 	'Since it is a concatenation of a UAC and UAS, no explicit definitions are needed for its behavior."
> 	
> 	Since the behavior of a B2BUA is the same as the behavior of a UAC/UAS, what was the need for defining a new logical entity - B2BUA? I am trying to understand the motivation behind adding this definition in the RFC.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chinmay
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip