[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] B2BUA & Max-Forwards
Drage, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> This thread is definitely going way beyond what it should do (both in
> scope and duration) - it did however start (about a 100 messages ago)
> with some reasonable modifications to the B2BUA definition, and save
> those relatively minor modifications, I do not want to see any other
> modifications in RFC 3261 or its next revision.
>
> I certainly will not agree to removal of any existing definition of
> B2BUA.
Well, we have some time to conclude this (since we are not revving
rfc3261 for some time), but it was my sense that there was ROUGH
consensus to remove it.
Rough doesn't mean unanimous of course...
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip