[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK

To: jh@lohi.eng.song.fi
Subject: RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
From: Robert Sparks <rsparks@dynamicsoft.com>
Date: 18 Dec 2002 16:05:29 -0600
Cc: Jiri Kuthan <jiri@iptel.org>, "Drage, Keith (Keith)" <drage@lucent.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@lmf.ericsson.se>, sip@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <15872.30769.394777.966989@harjus.eng.song.fi>
List-help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <475FF955A05DD411980D00508B6D5FB00439EB5C@en0033exch001u.uk.lucent.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20021218124417.02c6ceb8@iptel.org> <15872.30769.394777.966989@harjus.eng.song.fi>
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org

I've added this to the list of bugs being tracked as bug #684.

It has always been the intent that no element ever generate
a response to an ACK. 

Here is some evidence of that intent:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sip] Replies to ACK
  - From: Jonathan Rosenberg

References:
- RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
  - From: Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
  - From: Jiri Kuthan
- RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
  - From: jh

Prev by Date: RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
Next by Date: [no subject]
Previous by thread: RE: [Sip] Replies to ACK
Next by thread: Re: [Sip] Replies to ACK
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread