Re: [Sip] Replies to ACK

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>]

inline.

Jiri Kuthan wrote:

>
>> This will cause the INVITE state machine to consider that response
>> as a response to the original INVITE (CSeq method is not needed in
>> the matching process!).
>
>
> Is that some implicit assumption too? I read the following in spec,
> section 17.1.3: "A response matches ... If the method parameter in
> the CSeq header field matches the method of the request that created
> the transaction." It does not mention any special case, in which
> method matching is not used. Which is IMHO correct.

Not an implicit assumption, just me forgetting that the method check was 
there too. So, I guess there would not be any confusion in the client 
state machine. But, there are enough other potential problems that I 
still think its not a good idea.

-Jonathan R.

--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip