RE: [Sip] INFO considered harmful

[Orit Levin <orit@radvision.com>]

Inline.

Orit.

> The big huge difference I have been trying to point out is that EVENTS
> DEFINES SEMANTICS, whereas INFO doesnt.
> MIME provides semantics and syntax that are independent of the type.
> SIP events provides semantics and syntax that are independent of the
> package.
> INFO provides nothing.

INFO provides "minimal" but very important semantics: asynchronous data
reliably follows the established SIP path.

Another solution would be to have each pair of UAs registered to each
other's event packages (and using EVENTs minimal semantics only).

Would it be the preferred way to go???


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip