PS, a bugzilla bug was logged against this some time back: http://www.sipwg.org/sipwg/show_bug.cgi?id=682 -Jonathan R. Peter Päppinghaus wrote:
I have posted this earlier, but it seems to have gone unnoticed. Hi, I believe to have stumbled on a buggy example in RFC 3261. The 200 OK in the REGISTER example of RFC 3261, sec. 24.1 contains an Expires header, but no expires parameter in the Contact header. This violates RFC 3261, sec. 10.3, bullet 8: "Each Contact value MUST feature an "expires" parameter indicating its expiration interval chosen by the registrar." Regards, Peter Paeppinghaus
-- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave. Chief Scientist First Floor dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (973) 952-5050 http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 http://www.dynamicsoft.com _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip