[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP Working Group

I concur with Kevin.

> "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote:
> > 
> > In order to shorten the number of versions ahead, I suggest 
> that the 
> > authors of the draft have a look (if they did not do it yet) at the 
> > MIB Review guidelines Internet-Draft 
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelin
> > es-01.txt. This is not final yet, but it is quite stable, and me or 
> > whoever will be assigned to review this MIB  will use it 
> for the MIB 
> > quality review (from the SNMP / SMI point of view).

Kevin wrote: 
> we did for rev -05.  jean-francios mule digested the guidelines and 
> made sure our draft was aligned.
To be precise, we did address *some* of the ops-mib-review guidelines
(Bert has been showing us the way in the ipcdn wg so we took it into
account as part of this draft update). What we did revise per the mib
guidelines are:
 - boilerplate
 - module identity copyright
 - normative vs. informative references
 - counters: we looked at the way we use counters with Kevin
 - I think we're clean on inetaddress'es & rfc3291 but haven't looked
back at the details

That is all I believe and we may have missed a couple.
Jean-Francois.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip