Kevin Lingle wrote:
I have begun to look at the mib a bit, and I am a bit concerned that there is far too much information exposed, in terms of statistics, at least. I have to apologize for raising this so late in the game, but it is only recently that my day job has brought me into OAMP areas.
not sure if the above reference to statistics is directly related
to your comment on sipTransactionTable below or not.
Yes.
if not, are there other statistics that you feel fall into the category or exposing far too much information?
I want to look some more and provide some additional comments.
Well, discussion can happen any time. Its happening now, in this email thread. I dont know what else you are expecting. I don't think the table is viable. You had similar feedback. Seems like a clear cut resolution to me.One item that struck me as particularly demanding on an implementation is the sipTransactionTable. There is a huge amount of work in maintaining this table. I really doubt people will want to implement it.
i had similar feedback from others when support of the sipTransactionTable
was being considered by a project. the effort involved in supporting
the table was a problem.
we can focus some discussion on the viability of the table during wg last call.
i'd rather do that than to yank the table w/out further discussion.
*This* is the discussion.
at the very least, we can definitely make the table optional. right now it appears to be in a mandatory group - which seem wrong to me anyway.Mandatory is definitely wrong. I am not even sure optional is useful.