Re: [Sip] Re: [Simple] [Fwd: RE: SIP WG bugzilla instance]

[Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>]

It would be even more helpful if this existed for all active working 
group documents, automatically, not just the 326* documents. We could 
then make sure all open issues are automatically included in the next 
IETF discussion slot.

Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> Robert Sparks wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > I apologize now for violating the no-crosspost policy, but
> > this spans all the groups. Please, please, reply _ONLY_ to
> > sip@ietf.org (which is what should happen if you hit your
> > reply button if I've built this message correctly).
> >
> > If you have any opinions, positive or negative, about our
> > use of bugzilla for issue tracking and whether other groups
> > should follow the model, now would be a good time to comment.
>
> I think it has helped us immensely in the SIP and SIPPING WGs.
> It is nice to be able to go to the bug site and view a list
> of open bugs, and furthermore, track them to completion.
>
> - vijay
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip