[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sip] SIP and EAP

To: vesa.torvinen@ericsson.fi
Subject: [Sip] SIP and EAP
From: Corrado Derenale <derenale@polito.it>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 15:18:33 +0200
Cc: jari.arkko@ericson.fi, aki.niemi@nokia.com, sipping@ietf.org, sip@ietf.org
List-help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: derenale@polito.it
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830

Dear all,
I saw the Torval proposal for authenticate SIP messages with EAP.

The IETF document draft-torvinen-http-eap-02.txt

Was that proposal been inserted in a new draft or RFC?

We are working to find an extensible authentication schema for SIP and are we now evaluating that old proposal.

Thank you in advance,

Corrado Derenale.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Prev by Date: Re: [Sip] a question on section 18.2.2 in RFC 3261
Next by Date: [Sip] Why do we need 3-way handshake for INVITE transaction....
Previous by thread: [Sip] a question on section 18.2.2 in RFC 3261
Next by thread: Re: [Sip] Why do we need 3-way handshake for INVITE transaction....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread