[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Sip] Use of Require header field in connected-identity
Dean,
Good idea. I will include the following: "By sending a request with a
changed From header field URI only to targets that have indicated support
for this option, there should be no need to send this option tag in a
Require header field."
Also, following a suggestion from Cullen I will change the tag name to
"from-change".
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:dean.willis at softarmor.com]
> Sent: 04 October 2006 22:13
> To: Elwell, John
> Cc: SIP; Paul Kyzivat
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Use of Require header field in connected-identity
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
>
> > During WGLC I received a comment from Paul that when sending a mid-
> > dialog request with a changed From header field URI, we
> should also
> > include a Require header field with option tag id-change.
> In theory
> > it should not be needed, because the peer UA will already have
> > indicated id-change in the Supported header field, so it is known
> > to support the capability. Paul's rationale was to include the
> > Require header field in case something had gone wrong.
> >
> > I heard no other comment in favour of or against this. My opinion
> > is that it is unnecessary - if something of this nature has gone
> > wrong, then it is hard to be sure that simply including the
> Require
> > header field will be sufficient to avoid further problems.
> > Furthermore, if we specify use of the Require header field, it
> > would mean we have to specify what to do if we get back a 420. So
> > on balance I am against making this change.
> >
> > Any other opinions?
> How about including in the draft a discussion of why the Require:
> usage isn't useful? ;-)
>
> --
> Dean
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip