[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Sip] Re: A Comment draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-00.txt
THanks for the comments, and apologies for the slow response. See below.
Samir Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
1) Shouldn’t we have reference to the open bugs in this guide in
some form. Atleast a reference to bugzilla web site?
That is not within the scope of this document. There is ongoing
discussion on what to do with those bugs, no conclusion yet. But this
document serves only to enumerate the SIP specifications.
2) It refers the RFC 2976 for SIP INFO. Shouldn’t it refer the RFC
2833 there. We may be widening its scope to media too..
INFO is an existing normative extension to SIP and so it is referenced.
That doesn't mean we are proposing it be used for DTMF; it just means
its an extension. RFC 2833 is not a SIP extension, it is an RTP
extension. So it is not included.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza
Cisco Fellow Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
Cisco Systems
jdrosen at cisco.com FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip