Re: [Sip] Updated route construct specification

[Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug at acm.org>]

Hi Jonathan,

It seems that the text for the 305 response disappeared between -01 and
-02, but draft-rosenberg-sip-outbound-discovery-mid-dialog-00 is still
using this reference.  Is there a plan to move the 305 text to another I-D?

Thanks.

Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> I've updated this document. It is (once again) almost completely
> rewritten. Until it appears in the archives, you can pick it up at:
> 
> http://www.jdrosen.net/papers/draft-rosenberg-sip-route-construct-02.txt
> 
> Basically, it proposes to turn Service-Route into the inverse of Path,
> so that Service-Route/Path work more like record-routing. This is now
> specified in a way which is backwards compatible with IMS, which was an
> issue for the previous spec. I believe this makes service-route usable
> for the internet at large, and it is a key part of solving the
> sip-outbound mid-dialog failover problem. Its also WAY simpler than
> previous versions. The whole bit in there about redirections overriding
> route sets is now folded into the more general UA loose routing document
> I also published.
> 
> Just to get some controversy thrown in there, the draft also specifies
> as part of its behavior that a UA register only a single contact at a
> time, and only that contact get reflected in the REGISTER response.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonathan R.


-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin           [                                 ]
Home: marc at petit-huguenin.org [ RFC1855-compliant space for rent]
Work: marc at 8x8.com            [                                 ]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip