RE: [Sip] Question about Poll: Proposal relating to keepalive, TCP, and UDP usage in draft-ietf-sip-outbound

["Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)" <christer.holmberg at ericsson.com>]

Hi,

I agree with these high level goals.

Regards,

Christer

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy at cisco.com] 
> Sent: 31. joulukuuta 2006 3:01
> To: Cullen Jennings
> Cc: SIP
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Question about Poll: Proposal relating to 
> keepalive, TCP,and UDP usage in draft-ietf-sip-outbound
> 
> 
> If the people who have been expressing strong opinions on the 
> details of this proposal could comment on if they agree with 
> these high level goals or not, it would be really helpful for 
> trying to get this draft to move forward.
> 
> On Dec 16, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
> > Practically speaking given where we are today, I would be a 
> fan of a 
> > solution that meant the following goals:
> >
> > 1) allowed deployments that wanted to use TCP to use TCP
> >
> > 2) allowed deployments that wanted to use UDP to use only 
> UDP with the 
> > known limitations that the UA would not be able to send 
> large requests
> >
> > 3) allowed deployments that wanted to use both UDP and TCP to do so 
> > and not have the size limitations by using switchover
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip