RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt: Closing of Opened issues

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

Then, only the VIA headers are affected. No impact whatsoever on
Record-Route and 
Request-URI as it is still sip: to sip: 

You should really NOT use the transport parameter in RR or Request-URI.

But you are right, I probably need to make it more explicit in the text.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh at tutpro.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 09:07
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: sip at ietf.org; Alan Johnston; Keith Drage; Peterson, Jon; 
> Dean Willis
> Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt: Closing of 
> Opened issues
> 
> Francois Audet writes:
> 
>  > So: to summarize, with the current draft, the double 
> record-route  > procedures are never used.
> 
> thanks for the your interpretation that differs from what i 
> read earlier on this list.  
> 
> in order to make this perfectly clear to proxy implementers, 
> can someone, please, tell exactly what the proxy should so in 
> terms of r-r headers and r-uri when request with sip: uri 
> scheme comes in over udp and goes out over tls.
> 
> -- juha
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip