RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

If it uses Outbound, then connection gets re-established by 
client automatically (based on keep-alives).

Otherwise, correct, you don't know.

I guess the real question is "do we need to solve this case"?

I guess to me it means that it would be useful only for 
mutual TLS cases. Is this big enough of a problem to justify
the expense of having to deal with the parameter?

That's a question for the group. I don't have a strong opinion
on it (just a preference for using Outbound for this).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh at tutpro.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:42
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: Robert Sparks; SIP IETF; Dean Willis
> Subject: RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last 
> thoughts on transport=tls?
> 
> Francois Audet writes:
> 
>  > Later, in-dialog request will be sent on each hop reusing 
> the existing  > established connections (TLS or TCP) as per 
> current RFC 3261  > procedures.
> 
> what if established connection breaks for one reason or 
> another and needs to be re-established for routing in-dialog 
> request?  if there is no transport info in request route, how 
> does the proxy know which transport to use?
> 
> -- juha
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip