RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?

[jh at tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen)]

Francois Audet writes:

 > I guess the real question is "do we need to solve this case"?
 > 
 > I guess to me it means that it would be useful only for 
 > mutual TLS cases. Is this big enough of a problem to justify
 > the expense of having to deal with the parameter?

proxy-to-proxy communication is important enough case to justify the
transport=tls parameter.

-- juha


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip