RE: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts on transport=tls?

[jh at tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen)]

Francois Audet writes:

 > But for that, you can use SIPS in Record-Route, no?

 > It would be semantically identical, no?

i don't know and don't care, because i don't use sips uri scheme for
anything.  it is artificial to imply transport protocol from uri scheme,
when there is a way to tell it straight.  perhaps someone will later
invent some other secure transport protocol to be used with sips when
then implication will fail.

-- juha


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip