Re: [Sip] Ready for WGLC on SIPS draft? Any last thoughts ontransport=tls?

["Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg at alcatel-lucent.com>]

Francois Audet wrote:
> What I haven't heard is any voice strongly being against the 
> re-instatement of transport=tls (except perhaps myself, but I don't 
> care anymore: just want to move on).

FWIW, and for the record, I am also against the re-instatement of
"transport=tls" for much the same reasons that you had mentioned
in a previous email (c.f. 
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg19371.html).
Plus, now that TLS is supported over other transports, we will
need to indicate the transport in the parameter as well.

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg at {alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip