Re: [Sip] Resource Priority Header namespaces

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

This document seems to have its origin in a single or a small number of 
customers.

From the text in the draft it seems the priority values for each 
namespace are used totally independently. I wonder whether someone has 
actually thought what this means for a real system when priority values 
of 50+ namespaces are used together.
Does anyone know how the use cases are going to look like?

Ciao
Hannes

DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> I will leave James to respond to this as it impacts the draft, but
> assuming we reach that stage, I will remember this point for the PROTO
> writeup.
>
> Regards
>
> Keith 
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh at joelhalpern.com] 
> > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:23 PM
> > To: sip at ietf.org
> > Subject: [Sip] Resource Priority Header namespaces
> >
> > I read over the draft in last call requesting new RPH 
> > namespace assignments.
> > In and of itself it looks non-objectionable.  While I don't 
> > understand the need for that many name spaces, or those 
> > specific values, my first reaction is to say "okay" anyway.
> >
> > However, I went and looked at RFC4412, which defines the 
> > header namespace registration.
> > That RFC calls for a standard track RFC for defining namespaces.
> > And the text is quite explicit that one should not create a 
> > multiplicity of namespaces, but should try to use existing 
> > spaces first.
> >
> > So, unless we want to check RFC4412, it seems that the 
> > request for 32 namespaces in
> > 	draft-ietf-sip-rph-new-namespaces-00.txt
> > really needs more explanation / justification.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Joel M. Halpern
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> > sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> > Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> >
> >     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>   



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip