Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00

[Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>]

On Dec 2, 2007, at 3:28 PM, DRAGE, Keith ((Keith)) wrote:

> Working backwards through my mailbox, and I guess I should have  
> read this first.
>
> Yes, what I had in mind was the non-delivery of packets, e.g. for  
> the reason of non-sequential delivery.
>
> SIP will not tell you you have missed any packets in this case.

But if the sender follows basic NIT rules and doesn't overlap  
transactions within the dialog, then you'll never have out-of-order  
delivery. If you're sending ordered delivery, don't send packet 2  
until packet 1 gets ACKed.

--
Dean



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip