[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sip] comments on draft-gurbani-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-00



Yes, that was the one I was talking about.

-Jonathan R.

Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
This looks like a good document and definitely something that is in the category of an essential correction. My only comment is that I think there is also an issue with v6 URI equality that we need to fix, and may as well wrap that into a single v6 essential correction.

Jonathan: Can you elaborate on the v6 URI equality fix? Are you referring to the one Brett raised about the equivalence of sip:[::ffff:192.0.2.128] and sip:[::ffff:c000:280]?

If so, we have decided to include it in this v6 essential correction.

Nits:

Missing period at end of abstract

Will add in.

Thanks,

- vijay

-- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 499 Thornall St. Cisco Fellow Edison, NJ 08837 Cisco, Voice Technology Group jdrosen at cisco.com http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084 http://www.cisco.com


_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip