Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00

[Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com>]

On 12/2/07 10:30 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
> But if the sender follows basic NIT rules and doesn't overlap 
> transactions within the dialog, then you'll never have out-of-order 
> delivery. If you're sending ordered delivery, don't send packet 2 
> until packet 1 gets ACKed.

I had it in my head many years ago that overlapping NITs were illegal 
also, but I couldn't ever find any supporting text in RFCs. I think it 
was in some pre-publication versions of 2543-bis, but got pulled out 
before finalization.

/a


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip