[Sip] Re: SIP location conveyance discussion

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

I believe there were two points of contention at Monday's SIP meeting 
wrt Location Conveyance:

 -- the "recipient=" providing an expected result, given no security 
properties, and

 -- the granularity of error codes

I'm not sure we're planning on talking about the first topic 
tomorrow, and I definitely consider it secondary to solving the error 
code issue.

Now, folks admitted that they hadn't read the recent version of the 
ID, and the error section has changed a great deal.  Thus, I ask that 
everyone attending tomorrow's face-to-face read section 3.4 , and all 
of section 5 to bring yourself up to speed on the current text.  The ID is here

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-09.txt

James

At 02:35 PM 12/5/2007, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\) wrote:
> We failed to achieve agreement in the SIP WG on one of the issues for
> location conveyance.
>
> The chairs and AD considered we were unlikely to get rapid agreement on
> list and a further face-to-face discussion in Vancounver would be
> appropriate.
>
> Therefore we have:
>
> Place:  Salon 2
> Time:           16:15
> Date:           Thursday 6th December
> Duration:       1 hour
>
> for those who are interested in resolving this problem.
>
> Regards
>
> Keith


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip