[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy
Hi Keith,
I submitted a new version earlier today.
Regards,
Christer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage at alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: 16. tammikuuta 2008 13:35
> To: sip at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to
> UAS via proxy
>
> (As WG chair)
>
> I am seeing consensus on the second draft.......
>
>
> .....that everyone is confused by the semantics applied to
> the various headers, and the mail exchange does not seem to
> be clearing it up.
>
> I urge Christer and Hans Erik to get a new version out as
> soon as possible in the hope of removing some of the confusion.
>
> Regards
>
> Keith
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage at alcatel-lucent.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:58 PM
> > To: sip at ietf.org
> > Subject: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS
> via proxy
> >
> > (As WG chair)
> >
> > In fulfilment of our charter items of
> >
> > Dec 2007 Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS
> via proxy to
> > WGLC
> > Feb 2008 Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS
> via proxy to
> > IESG (PS)
> >
> > We now have a couple of proposals on the table for solving the
> > problem.
> >
> > The original draft from Jonathan and which led to the
> creation of the
> > charter items by the WG is unfortunately expired, but is at:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-01.txt
> >
> > The alternative document from Christer, etc is at:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-holmberg-sip-target-
> > uri-delive
> > ry-00.txt
> >
> > We obviously need to make a decision between the two approaches so
> > please attempt to address the following specific points via the
> > mailing
> > list:
> >
> > 1) Problem cases: These are summarised in section 4.4 of
> > draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-01 and from my read of the other
> > draft, I don't believe that this draft adds any others.
> > If you believe there are other cases that should be covered by the
> > solution, then please identify them. If there is support on any new
> > problem cases, I would encourage the authors of both drafts to add
> > text concerning these problem cases.
> >
> > 2) Clarifications: If for any reason you don't understand either
> > draft, or believe that there are technical issues that are not
> > represented in the current draft, please post your questions /
> > comments to the list. I would encourage authors of both drafts to
> > revise as frequently as appropriate to reflect the current state of
> > discussion.
> >
> > 3) Support for either position. If you wish to indicate support for
> > either position please do so, but please accompany this is
> technical
> > reasoning as to why you have this position, as that will help other
> > members of the WG form a position.
> >
> > I would encourage as much list discussion as possible before
> > Philadelphia. I suspect we will need to have a discussion at the
> > face-to-face meeting in Philadephia, but list discussion is
> essential
> > prior to that. If we can solve this positions on list, then
> well and
> > good, and even better (that is how we are meant to make decisions).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
> > sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use
> > sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
> sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip