Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet

[Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com>]

At Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:00:38 -0500,
Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> 10 minutes on the phone number dichotomy thing isn't going to be even 
> close enough to cut it. It should be either zero or a more significant 
> number.
> 
> We have 30 minutes on media security. The only chartered item there is 
> the requiremetns document which I thought was mostly done. Why is there 
> so much time dedicated to this? I would rather move that to INFO or the 
> identity mess.

I agree with Jonathan here. The media-security requirements document
is basically done (see my review earlier today). What it needs it to
be WGLCed and sent to the IESG.

My vote here is for taking this time and giving it to the
TOTE/INFO/mediactrl discussion, which seems like it has a lot of
important and complicated issues that need to be worked through.

-Ekr
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip