Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

And I would think the two X.509-cert related drafts could be combined and take less than 30 minutes.

I agree with Jonathan about the phone number/identity topic - considering the discussion-leader field says "Most of the Working Group", it will take the allotted 10 minutes just to pass the microphone around. ;)

-hadriel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Rosenberg
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 6:01 PM
> To: Dean Willis
> Cc: IETF SIP List; Cullen Jennings
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet
>
> 10 minutes on the phone number dichotomy thing isn't going to be even
> close enough to cut it. It should be either zero or a more significant
> number.
>
> We have 30 minutes on media security. The only chartered item there is
> the requiremetns document which I thought was mostly done. Why is there
> so much time dedicated to this? I would rather move that to INFO or the
> identity mess.
>
> -Jonathan R.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip