Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet

["DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS" <mdolly at att.com>]

James,

I fully support your proposal.

Cheers,

Martin 

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
James M. Polk
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:47 PM
To: Dean Willis; IETF SIP List
Cc: Cullen Jennings
Subject: Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet

At 03:39 PM 2/28/2008, Dean Willis wrote:

>Keith and I just spent the past three hours revising the agenda for
>SIP at IETF 71.
>
>It's very full, and we are not going to have time to discuss
>everything we need to discuss -- we have only 2.5 hours this time.
>
>Please take a look at:
>
>http://www.softarmor.com/mediawiki/index.php/SIP_Agenda_IETF_71

I thought (and hoped) Resource-Priority in Responses
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-sip-rph-in-responses-01.t
xt
was within the charter (but without a specific milestone) that we can 
make a WG item and WGLC about the same day?

Keith (putting him on the spot) mentioned this in Chicago.  Vancouver 
muddied the water with the introduction of "use-case#2" - which has 
now been explicitly removed from consideration by this version.

What do the WG (and chairs) think about this?

>--
>Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip