Re: [Sip] RFC 4474 and PSTN

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

I would instead not put the SIP Identity header there.
No additional work needed.

Ciao
Hannes

Elwell, John wrote:
> There seems to be some interest in adding some indicator to the URI or
> to the header field to warn of the limited guarantee of authenticity or
> the opposite (i.e.,lack of such an indicator would mean the guarantee is
> low, i.e., the identity has not been verified).
>
> I think on this issue it is just a matter of somebody putting things
> together into a draft. I think Dean and/or Adam were the main initiators
> of this proposal - something like a source=pstn parameter. Would
> somebody care to author a draft? Or do we need further discussion?
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>   

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip