Hi Robert,
Regarding the invfix draft, I don't know to what length we want to specify the changes to apply in RFC 3261, but I found out one more 3261 paragraph that could be updated:
Page 87:
Section 14.1 - Replace the paragraph starting with "2. If there is an ongoing INVITE server transaction" with
2. If there is an ongoing INVITE server transaction, the TU MUST
wait until the transaction reaches the confirmed, accepted or terminated
state before initiating the new INVITE.
Best Regards,
EricT
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip