Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

I think it's really for the STUN-in-SIP UDP thing more than double-CRLF-in-TCP.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Juha Heinanen
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 08:59
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: sip at ietf.org; drage at alcatel-lucent.com; dean.willis at softarmor.com
> Subject: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt
> 
> Christer Holmberg writes:
> 
>  > Based on discussions we've had in SIP, I have (with some 
> good input  > from a number of people) put together a draft 
> which defines a  > mechanism to indicate support of, and use, 
> the keep-alive techniques  > defined in draft-outbound, 
> without using the Outbound mechanism  > itself.
> 
> why does the keepalive support be indicated?  why can't the 
> UA simply start sending keepalives and be happy if it 
> receives responses?  this works today fine with double-CRLF 
> keepalives without any indication or outbound support.
> 
> -- juha
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip