Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

> Then we may very well consider making "respond to CRLF with 
> CRLF" a proposed standardized way too.
> I mean it is simple and works. Which I prefer over 
> negotiation protocols.

So, basically, you are proposing that for connection-oriented transport,
we use "respond to double-CRLF with single-CRLF" instead of Christer's draft.

I assume that would mean that for UDP transport, we'd still be using
Christer's draft.

Is this your proposal?
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip