[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] Toward the Evolution of SIP and Related Working Groups
> > draft-ietf-sip-saml
> -- I'm not sure this one is ever getting done.
>
> So I'm not sure there's enough there to justify a WG.
>
> How about an "Identity in SIP" workiFrom sip-bounces at ietf.org Mon Jun 23 14:48:30 2008
Return-Path: <sip-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sip-archive at optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FE23A6805;
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sip at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F3C3A6805
for <sip at core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1Q+zrfFsmoQk for <sip at core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D785C3A6A66
for <sip at ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,692,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="117323267"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196])
by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2008 14:48:24 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237])
by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5NLmO7w005284;
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:24 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194])
by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5NLmN1U026940;
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:48:23 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing at cisco.com>
To: "'Dean Willis'" <dean.willis at softarmor.com>,
"'Hadriel Kaplan'" <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>
References: <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BE3C778B0 at mail.acmepacket.com><408DFED6-302C-4525-BCD5-1E43B68369BE at softarmor.com><485FEDBA.9090304 at cisco.com><549C8D7E-8F0D-43C8-B6C3-B61D5D0DE238 at softarmor.com><E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BE7D5C137 at mail.acmepacket.com>
<5744EABA-0861-4B95-BD91-2C4F0AC92BFE at softarmor.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:23 -0700
Message-ID: <08d401c8d57a$dc7216d0$c2f0200a at cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <5744EABA-0861-4B95-BD91-2C4F0AC92BFE at softarmor.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: AcjVd00Eu5N8KFfbSbWxzCG0QqfVhAAA2DSQ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=416; t=1214257704; x=1215121704;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=dwing at cisco.com;
z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing at cisco.com>
|Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Sip]=20Toward=20the=20Evolution=20of=2
0SIP=20and=20Related=20Working=20Groups |Sender:=20;
bh=KXuh0bA7fRkqlbxqhRcjzf5RhdpP7WgqXKa7qzeAPBk=;
b=ZLO5UYfAHlIngytlqzQmpGg8umY+uGg7XdVlL/8T4HQsa4ZZIZGmFfK5YQ
ZEEgS5kQdhLcJtJAkycEPSxTAPZrhH3/87NHa8ewWDY8aSB9slvQLDZICXrq
8FB1zmCQ+f;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing at cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: sip at ietf.org, 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Toward the Evolution of SIP and Related Working Groups
X-BeenThere: sip at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces at ietf.org
> > draft-ietf-sip-saml
> -- I'm not sure this one is ever getting done.
>
> So I'm not sure there's enough there to justify a WG.
>
> How about an "Identity in SIP" working groupng group that takes on
> fixing RFC 4474 for gateways/b2buas and possibly considers
> identity/role assertion using SAML?
I agree we need that. I have tried, and so far failed, to
initiate activity towards such an effort.
-d
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
that takes on
> fixing RFC 4474 for gateways/b2buas and possibly considers
> identity/role assertion using SAML?
I agree we need that. I have tried, and so far failed, to
initiate activity towards such an effort.
-d
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip