Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda

["Elwell, John" <john.elwell at siemens.com>]

Dean,

Well, just how exactly do we go about resolving the various Identify
issues (E.164 / SBCs / gateways)? I think Dan has tried unsuccessfully
for a BoF earlier. No agenda time in SIP this time. There have been some
huge email threads since Philadelphia. There are several relevant drafts
around (and possibly more before Dublin). 

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: 24 June 2008 20:20
> To: sip at ietf.org
> Cc: Keith Drage
> Subject: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda
> 
> 
> I've been tipped off that we may be down to as little as two 
> hours (or  
> maybe 2.5)  of meeting time in Dublin due to additional WG and BOF  
> events that didn't make it onto the earlier published agenda (like  
> MEDIACTRL).
> 
> What are the absolutely most important things we need to talk about?  
> What is the best possible use of our very valuable and very scarce  
> time together?
> 
> I suspect that going by-rote through the list of open milestones is  
> not the best use of our time.
> 
> Topics that I think we might want to talk about include but are not  
> limited to:
> 
> Agenda bash and announcements usually use 10 minutes
> 
> 1) Using SAML for SIP.
> -- Milestone was Dec. 2007
> -- Author has promised new rev before meeting
> -- Is the WG committed to doing this work?
> -- 10 minutes?
> 
> 2) Test Matrix for SIP to Draft Standard
> -- Milestone was Feb 2008
> -- How are we going to move forward?
> -- 10 minutes
> 
> 3) Delivery of Request URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy
> -- Milestone was Feb 2008
> -- Conversation has lagged. Do we see a workable solution?
> -- 30 minutes?
> 
> 4) DTLS-SRTP
> -- Milestone was Feb 2008
> -- Delayed by the RFC 4474/Gateway/B2BUA
> -- Decide: Do we hold DTLS-SRTP or publish with a caveat?
> -- EKR may not be attending, can we resolve on-list? (no time?)
> 
> 5) Mechanisms for UA Initiated Privacy
> -- Milestone is July 2008
> -- Author has promised new rev before meeting
> -- 20 minutes?
> 
> 6) Termination of early Dialog Prior to Final Response (199)
> -- Milestone is November 2008
> -- Substantial list activity
> -- 30 minutes?
> 
> 7) Guidelines for SIP Extension Modalities
> -- No milestone
> -- Needs conceptual discussion
> -- Defer until #8 below is resolved? (no time?)
> 
> 8) The INFO solution and Paul's compromise for historical registration
> -- No milestone
> -- Previous WG consensus to "do something"
> -- 40 minutes?
> 
> 
> Am I missing something that is critically important?
> 
> Which topics do we really need to talk about in order to move forward?
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip