Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda

[Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>]

On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Elwell, John wrote:

> Dean,
>
> Well, just how exactly do we go about resolving the various Identify
> issues (E.164 / SBCs / gateways)? I think Dan has tried unsuccessfully
> for a BoF earlier. No agenda time in SIP this time. There have been  
> some
> huge email threads since Philadelphia. There are several relevant  
> drafts
> around (and possibly more before Dublin).

My suggestion is in two parts:

1) For DTLS-SRTP Framework, simply document the limitation of RFC 4474  
and move on. This is a one-paragraph add to the framework.

2) For the remainder, I'd like to suggest the "REal Time Identity and  
Role Expression" (RETIRE) Working Group, which would take over the RFC  
4474 revision along with SIP-SAML.

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip