Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda

["Dan Wing" <dwing at cisco.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:48 PM
> To: Elwell, John
> Cc: sip at ietf.org; Keith Drage
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda
> 
> 
> On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
> 
> > Dean,
> >
> > Well, just how exactly do we go about resolving the various Identify
> > issues (E.164 / SBCs / gateways)? I think Dan has tried 
> unsuccessfully
> > for a BoF earlier. No agenda time in SIP this time. There 
> have been  
> > some
> > huge email threads since Philadelphia. There are several relevant  
> > drafts
> > around (and possibly more before Dublin).
> >
> 
> My suggestion is in two parts:
> 
> 1) For DTLS-SRTP Framework, simply document the limitation of 
> RFC 4474  
> and move on. This is a one-paragraph add to the framework.

Sounds good.

> 2) For the remainder, I'd like to suggest the "REal Time 
> Identity and  
> Role Expression" (RETIRE) Working Group, which would take 
> over the RFC  
> 4474 revision along with SIP-SAML.

Sounds good, too.

-d

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip